User:Meghanherlitzka/Haloquadratum walsbyi/Raf19275 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

mehganheritzka, chinedu23, ragi02, and hart hequembourg


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Meghanherlitzka/Haloquadratum_walsbyi?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Haloquadratum walsbyi

Evaluate the drafted changes
So far it looks like you are in the beginning stages of drafting, as I can only see references. I would recommend inserting the references using the "cite" feature, and not just a link in the sandbox. This will help automatically number and organize the references in the desired section. It will also help when you begin drafting, so you can have a number next to the sentence that refers to the references section. All of the sources seem reliable and unbiased, which is a great start. Some, however, were published in 2006, so newer genomic data may be available.

I noticed that in the description section, the word mesophile is used incorrectly. It would be referred to as a mesophilic organism. I would also like to see a caption below the image stating what is used to visualize that cell, as it is a bit confusing to look at with no context. Maybe a section can even be dedicated to the visualization of the archaea.