User:Megthetrilobiter/Petroleum geochemistry/ProBuss Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Clarity -

Overall, the clarity of this article is excellent. Each talking point was written clearly and was effectively communicated. You effectively communicated challenging topics so nice work! For the sake of clarity I would see if you can find a way to simply explain some of the more challenging concepts such as explaining the different types of petroleum in more depth.

Structure -

This article was structured very well. You have clearly defined subsections and a solid introduction. Each section flows logically and avoids unnecessary information. Overall you did a good job in providing a comprehensive overview of each sub section.

Balance of coverage -

Again, I think you did a very good job of breaking down the topic into effective subsections. It reads clearly from beginning to end and leaves me with very few questions about the topic. I am obviously not an expert on the subject but after reading your page on Petroleum I did not find any areas that lacked significant coverage. Nice job.

Neutrality -

This article maintains a neutral tone throughout and presents the information in an objective way. I was not able to find a place where the tone is not neutral so nice work.

Sources -

Each of the sources opened up and lead to an academic outlet. There were no areas which were not referenced at least once so nicely done on this front as well.

Suggestions -

I have very few suggestions for your article as it was very well researched and written. One thing worth mentioning is that you should make sure that you are not using too technical of language as any individual without a background in earth sciences should have no problem reading it. Otherwise very nice work!