User:Megthetrilobiter/Petroleum geochemistry/Russellmorden Peer Review

General info
Megthetrilobiter
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Petroleum geochemistry
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Petroleum geochemistry

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hi Megthetrilobiter, I think the article has a really good start but could be expanded more. In the second paragraph you could go into more detail about what the purpose/benefits/reason for each of the numbered points you have there. Maybe you could add examples or images to help the reader learn more about Petroleum Geochemistry. I think you should add more sources to the article also. Wikipedia has a notability requirement where you need at least 2-3 reliable sources which means your article would not meet that requirement. Possibly if you choose to expand your article more it might help you meet this requirement. I really liked how you were able to explain Petroleum Geochemistry in a short and concise way. The content in your article is really good and informative on its own but I think would be even better if you expanded on the topic a little more. I do not see any problems with the formatting how the article is currently written but could maybe use some subheadings and structure if you choose to expand on it more. You do not have any images or media which may be a good thing to add if applicable. Overall I really like what you have so far and I do not see any problems with wikipedias requirements other than the notability requirement.