User:Megwalton/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * "Talk: Ocean acidification in the Great Barrier Reef" :
 * Brief notes have been added on this article including that there is a use of repetitive knowledge and the article draws unclear conclusions. The article also lacks clarification and needs added points as well as links to other Wikipedia pages. Some wording and grammatical changes need to be made plus flow of article/tone should be altered; Rated C-:
 * Sources needed:
 * To further explain coral reef damage from acidification and climate change-https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085610

Option 2

 * "Sustainable gardening":
 * More sources needed on explaining the topic. Some new information needs to be added as well as altering and adding onto current topic sentences.
 * Sources needed:
 * https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X18304484?casa_token=j830DzBdqXsAAAAA:7MoqpHWkCXYm3BV-PfdhlfIod-75phG67YLGaNnTshFx_5O8RZSWqDO2R_rI5xY3P7hUMuc
 * https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X18304484?casa_token=j830DzBdqXsAAAAA:7MoqpHWkCXYm3BV-PfdhlfIod-75phG67YLGaNnTshFx_5O8RZSWqDO2R_rI5xY3P7hUMuc

Option 3
Sources needed:
 * "Improved water source":
 * More information needs to be added, and some changes in some of the wording throughout the article. Other links relating to the given information in the article needs to be added as well.

https://washdata.org/monitoring/drinking-water
 * "Blue economy"
 * shows viable information but could have more. Also, current data needs to be added onto the article.
 * Sources needed:
 * https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12038-023-00375-x
 * Sources needed:
 * https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12038-023-00375-x

Option 5

 * "Ecotourism":
 * Several red-links in sentences were apparent in the article, and therefore needs to be altered and be given more non-biased information. The tone of article seems a little aggressive, listing a lot of negative affects- too imbalanced. :
 * Sources that should be considered or needed:
 * https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2022.1040318/full
 * https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-021-12703-5