User:Meh259/Swedish Sign Language/Meh259 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Chuck Haberl and the other editors.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Swedish Sign Language


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Swedish Sign Language

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * From reading the lead paragraph I can say that I know how important Swedish Sign Language is.
 * The sections of the article are placed well, if I would have to change anything I would put "Education and communication" right under "History" instead of being near the end.
 * I believe the article does reflect all the perspectives that are represented in the published literature. I believe nothing is left out.
 * I do not believe I can guess the perspective of the author.
 * The statements in the article seem to have solid sources backing them up.
 * Some changes I would recommend implementing into this article would be to add more information about the history of Swedish Sign Language. As of right now I personally believe it to be very short.
 * I believe the sources are in APA format.
 * There seems to be no spelling mistakes in this article.
 * If it is possible I would say to add more into the lead paragraph. I believe it can be longer than what it is now.
 * Other sections could be added. For example, the founder of the Swedish Sign Language.
 * Everything else looks to be perfect.