User:Mehakk12/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Aldonic Acid
 * Article Evaluation
 * The content of the article is indeed relevant to the topic and is presented in a neutral tone, but this article needs improvement as it is severely lacking in up-to-date information, incorporating only three references. Moreover, not all claims have citations, but those that do have reliable citations. Lastly, the talk page has no comments and is severely lacking in input from other contributors.
 * Sources
 * https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2006.05.023
 * https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/gc/d2gc00823h/unauth
 * https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2006.05.023
 * https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/gc/d2gc00823h/unauth

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Octene
 * Article Evaluation
 * Article is severely lacking in content and citations, with only 1 citation and less than 5 sentences. While the content is relevant to the topic, it is simply not enough to truly understand octenes. Nevertheless, the content is written neutrally and the one citation can be considered reliable and is all that is needed for the claims made in this article. Lastly, the talk page has no commentors.
 * Sources
 * https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2010.10.009
 * https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0965544112030036 (Tetramerization of ethylene to octene-1 (a review))
 * https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2010.10.009
 * https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0965544112030036 (Tetramerization of ethylene to octene-1 (a review))

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Pyrone
 * Article Evaluation
 * Article only has one citation and one paragraph worth of content, making it an article needing attention. The citation is also quite outdated, although it is relevant to the content. The content, although little, is relevant to the topic and is written neutrally. The only claims made in the article are supported by the citation, but it would be better if there were more examples and citations to further reinforce the content on this page. Much like the previous articles, the talk page on this one is also empty.
 * Sources
 * 2-Pyrone natural products and mimetics: isolation, characterisation and biological activity ( https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2005/np/b416651p/unauth)
 * https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00225a008
 * Inhibition of Alzheimer’s amyloid toxicity with a tricyclic pyrone molecule in vitro and in vivo (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05866.x)
 * https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00225a008
 * Inhibition of Alzheimer’s amyloid toxicity with a tricyclic pyrone molecule in vitro and in vivo (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05866.x)

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Conrad Willgerodt
 * Article Evaluation
 * The article is very poorly written, with little content and claims unsupported with citations. Moreover, there is only a single citation that is independent of the content, but is somewhat related to the topic itself. However, the content is indeed relevant to the topic and written neutrally. The talk page is also quite empty, and overall, this article needs a lot of improvement, which is not difficult the the information available on this individual.
 * Sources
 * https://www.thevespiary.org/rhodium/Rhodium/Vespiary/talk/files/1316-organic_reactions_v3b599.pdf?topic=9.0#page=89 (The Willgerodt Reaction)
 * https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2013/cs/c3cs60154d/unauth (Recent advances in the Willgerodt–Kindler reaction)
 * https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/3-540-30031-7_280.pdf (Willgerodt-Kindler Reaction)
 * https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2013/cs/c3cs60154d/unauth (Recent advances in the Willgerodt–Kindler reaction)
 * https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/3-540-30031-7_280.pdf (Willgerodt-Kindler Reaction)

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Ketenimine
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article is quite up to date with the sources and has relevant content, which is presented in a neutral tone. Moreover, the citations are presented adequately, to back up the claims. Nevertheless, there have been new discoveries with relation to this topic, which can further improve this article, therefore I believe this article also needs to be worked on. Also worth noting is that the talk page for this article is also empty.
 * Sources
 * https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201200383
 * https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201603074
 * https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.0c04078
 * https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201603074
 * https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.0c04078