User:Meimulee/Evaluate an Article

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it is also my group's topic for the Wikipedia project and we needed to read the article anyways. The National Women's Health Networks matters because it reviews federal funding for women's health. This includes mental health, physical health, and even health professions. My preliminary impression was pretty neutral. I wasn't expecting much, just to learn about what the National Women's Health Network was and the history. As I kept reading, I noticed myself becoming curious about what the values were, as they did not go in depth originally on the Wikipedia website.

Evaluate the article

 * Does the lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes; this article has an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic. This was basically just an overview of what the National Women's Health Organization is.
 * Does the lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes; The lead states that the National Women's Health Network discusses AIDS, reproductive rights, breast cancer, and more.
 * Does the lead include information that is not present in the article? (It shouldn't.)
 * no
 * Is the lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * The lead is not overly detailed.

Content

 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * No, the latest date recorded on here is 2015, when there was action between the National Women's Health Network in 2020-2021, during the 2020 pandemic.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Yes! there is content missing -> The twelve policy pillars
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * Yes, the article deals with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps of women/feminism.

Tone and Balance

 * Is the article neutral?
 * Yes, this article is neutral
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No, not views.
 * Are minority or fringe viewpoints accurately described as such?
 * No...? Confused by this question
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No.

Sources and References

 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes, as all of them are either direct from the site or from an information book.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * yes

Organization and writing quality

 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * yes, it is clear what is being presented and where the article will go next.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Not that I see...
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * YES! and I love this.

Images and Media

 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * No :(
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * N/a
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * N/a
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * N/a

Talk page discussion

 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There are no conversations being discussed, mainly just notes for future writers.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * Yes...????
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * N/a

Overall impressions

 * What are the article's strengths?
 * The article is well organized and supported by reliable sources.
 * How can the article be improved?
 * The article lacks information's on the 12 pillars and the Bills that were passed.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * I would say that this article is underdeveloped, but on the right track!