User:MeitheFish/Masked hamlet/MarAJade501 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

MarAJade501


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Masked hamlet


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Masked hamlet

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Good lead into the article very well written and informative. the only think I might change is this sentence "Other than their coloration, their behavior is largely similar to that of other hamlets, especially in their diet and egg-trading spawning patterns." its a little awkward in the lead, it might fit better in the behavior section or even getting rid of it as a whole.

the anatomy and morphology section is very clear and conscious I wouldn't change any of the sentences their. I might however suggest you add a image gallery into the section to show off the different color morphs if you can find images, I think it could help the reader understand better with visual interpretations as well.

In the distribution and habitat I would add some images of the locations of where its found but other than that I wouldn't change anything.

Behavior section is well written, I found a mistake in this line ", it has been hypothesized that each individual swaps their gender role after each successive spawn, one releasing sperm and the other releasing eggs." Delete the coma and capitalize the word "it" as you ended the previous sentence with a period. not sure if you meant to make it two separate sentences or on sentence

taxonomy section looks good my only two comments are one add another gallery of all the different species and two if they have them add the common name in to the scientific names, it can be very overwhelming to read all of those scientific names in concession.

Overall I really like your article I think it is well organized and nothing seems out of place. I like how you also include a border perspective on the taxonomy. I was able to access all the hyper links that you added into the article. all citations where also accessible and looked good, their is however one citation that has a bullet point at the very end of your reference list might want to either take it out if you didn't use it or reformate it to fit in with the rest of the references. overall I think it was a very well Written article with just some minor changes.