User:MelCarruthers/Environmental impact of iron ore mining/Alexpope01 Peer Review

General info
MelCarruthers
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:MelCarruthers/Environmental impact of iron ore mining
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Environmental impact of iron ore mining

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead has been updated and contains a more clear and concise introductory sentence for the article. It includes a brief description of the major sections of the article which is good and it is not overly detailed.

Content

The content added is relevant to the topic and adds a significant amount of clarity that was not present beforehand. All of the content seems to be up to date from my perspective and there doesn't seem to be any missing sections or information that doesn't belong. All of the environmental impacts of iron ore mining were presented clearly and some missing information that was previously missing has been updated accordingly. To my current knowledge, I don't think this article deals with any of Wikipedia's equity gaps or historically underrepresented populations.

Tone and Balance

The content that was added to this article was presented with neutrality and doesn't contain any opinionated phrases that may sway the reader in one direction. It also doesn't contain any viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented. All of the content that was added is based off of real facts that were retrieved from reliable sources. For example, under the iron mine tailings section, when discussing the toxic elements that can be found in iron ore tailings, the facts are presented clearly, concisely, and without desire to sway the reader into a certain viewpoint.

Sources and References

All of the content presented is backed up by reliable sources. It contains recent and up to date information as the articles that were referenced were published in 2023, 2022, 2021, and 2016. The content reflects what the sources say and all of the references are all retrieved from trustworthy publishers (I checked them). The sources also contain a wide variety of authors which should further convince you of the neutrality of the article. To my knowledge, the sources provided are all peer-reviewed so there aren't any better sources that could've been used. Finally, the links all work.

Organization

The organization of the content that was added was great. It was well written and easy to read. When I read it, it did not seem to have any grammatical or spelling errors. The added content was nicely broken down into small sections which reflected the major points related to the environmental impacts of iron ore mining.