User:Melanie.Roulin/Dichelobacter nodosus/Venessa.ibsen Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?  Mel Roulin
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Dichelobacter nodosus

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? No
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Not yet
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Nope!
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is a little short, need to add more information.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Now, it is.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There is some missing information.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No, it does not. Yes, it does!

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes, it is neutral. I mean it would be a little hard to be biased for or against a bacteria so I would be impressed if you managed it.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? nope
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? Nope

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Not Yet
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Not Yet
 * Are the sources current? Not Yet
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Not Yet
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, I tested some!

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Looks good. The antibiotic resistance section seems a little short but it does cover the topic well.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Yes
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Not yet
 * Are images well-captioned? Not yet
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Not yet
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Not yet

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Not yet
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? Not at all. Not yet.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Yes.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? No.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Not yet.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? There hasn't been much added to this article yet.
 * How can the content added be improved? Just add more!

Overall evaluation
I'm not sure if there is another spot I should be looking for content!

You all have made real head way since I last looked at the page! Looks good thus far, maybe a bit of editing and polish to finish it up. Great work.