User:Melikajvn/Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy/JShaw2003 Peer Review

General info
Melikajvn
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Melikajvn/Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Nuclear magnetic resonance

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

I am not really sure if you updated the lead, it seems like your first paragraph could be apart of the lead! A part of this paragraph gets very specifdic about spin, perhaps that could be a sub heading in the article.

content:

There is an extensive amount of content added by the user. It all seems true and to develop the quality of the original article however citations need to be added to support what the author is saying. The Content could also be categorized.

Tone and balance:

The content is written in a neutral tone, no bias is observed in the text. There does not seem to be any bold claims.

Sources and references:

There are only 4 sources in the bibliography and none linked in your sandbox. I think you need to expand your sources and make sure you include citations in your writing.

Organization:

I think that the organization of this draft can be improved by adding sub heading and sections. Breaking up the information may allow people viewing the wiki page to find the information they need faster.

Images and Media:

Two images are added however they likely could be refined using chemdraw or other molecule drawing software.

Overall:

Overall this article is contributing a lot of good information to the original article however this information needs to have a source and could be organized into categories to help the reader find what they are looking for faster. The images could be refined using chemdraw but they help demonstrate what is being explained. Overall this is a really good addition to the original article but please find some more sources and cite them!