User:Melisejones/Phyteuma nigrum/Plantlady890 Peer Review

General info
Melisejones
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Melisejones/Phyteuma nigrum
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Phyteuma nigrum

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall, the article draft looks very well written and well organized. The lead includes an information introductory sentence as well as, a bit of background about the species' unique evolutionary existence. The additional content that has been added to the article is relative to the complete understanding of what the species is, where to find it, and how it thrives within its ecosystem. The added content fills the pollination/reproduction gap, the geographical context gap, and the population size requirement gap. Overall, all necessary information seems to be included within the article draft. The tone of the article seems unbiased and educational. All of the information regarding the species for the article seems to be equally represented and neutrally presented. The references page seems to include all reputable and notable sources. Each source comes from scientific articles based on the examination and research of this specific species or this species family. The information that has been written and cited for the article seems to be accurately translated and cited in terms of not containing copyright and plagiarism. These sources seem to be current with what is known about this species and the family of species all together. While the article has a lot of vital information, it can be seen as a bit wordy or heavy worded. Adding in a few subcategories for each section of the article may make those studying the organism have an easier time locating what it is they want to know about this species. There doesn't seem to be any spelling or gramatical errors within the article. Within the original article there is only one image whereas, the draft article has two more images added with captions. Adding in a few images about what the leaves, fruit, and other parts of the organism look like may help readers correlate the various parts of text into visual understanding if they were to come across this species after reading the article. To conclude, this article as a whole is very strongly written both in the scientific context but also within the context for someone who just wants to know what the plant species is or what it looks like. There's not much improvement that needs to be done except for breaking down the large wordy sections and adding in a few more photo references. All in all, a very solid article draft.