User:Memphis2027/Deaf President Now/Takeoutsushi Peer Review

General info
Deaf President Now
 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Has the lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Memphis2027/Deaf President Now - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Deaf President Now - Wikipedia

Yes, because it was less lengthy, it got straight to the point. They still used existing information while adding their own which I think brought it together very well.

Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

No, the content that they provided belonged in the article because they didn't add anything out of the ordinary and they didn't delete anything that was important to the existing article.

Is the content added neutral?

Yes, I think that not just this article but all the articles we have worked on come from a neutral standpoint because it was in the past so it is pretty difficult to write these articles in a biased viewpoint.

Are the sources current?

Not exactly. One source is from 2001, another source is from 2014, and one is from 2022. My one piece of advice would be to try to find information less than 5 years old, just to keep up on any new information on the topic.

Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?

Overall, it was very well written there are just a few places where there should be a comma, and a few places where a comma is unnecessary. I would just put a few of the paragraphs in Grammarly just to make sure there are no errors.