User:Menacing djungelskog/Short-tailed chinchilla/Jasleend Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Menacing djungelskog


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Menacing djungelskog/Short-tailed chinchilla


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Short-tailed chinchilla

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The lead is very well written and detailed. It clearly describes the article's topic and I don't think there is a need to add much more information to it.

Content: The content is relevant to the short-tailed chinchilla. The conservation section of the article needs to be made up to date, but the rest of the article seems to be good.

Tone and Balance: The tone is neutral throughout the article and does not show any biases towards a particular position.

Sources and References: The source you found is very well detailed and very reliable. It will give you lots of information about the short-tailed chinchilla. The rest of the article is backed up by reliable sources and the links I checked worked. Your link took me to the article as well, and it looked good!

Organization: The article is organized and easy to read. I like the different sections especially the behavior and commercialization. There were no grammatical mistakes I found.

Images and Media: The images very much enhance the article. I like that there is a map that shows the past range of the chinchillas. I think you should add a current map when researching to contrast the difference in the past and current time period.

Overall Impressions: You should add more information to the conservation section and make it more up to date, and maybe even add some more information to the behavior section. Other than that, everything looks good! Keep up the good work!