User:Menacing djungelskog/Short-tailed chinchilla/Ryanzisk26 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Menacing djungelskog


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Menacing%20djungelskog/Short-tailed_chinchilla?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Short-tailed chinchilla

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * 1) Lead
 * 2) Right now the lead has not been edited to reflect the additions. Eventually, editing the lead would be advised, but with the stuff that's added right now it is okay.
 * 3) Content
 * 4) All of the content added was relevant to the article. There should be some more information on conservation in my opinion, but other than that I think that everything is relevant.
 * 5) Tone and Balance
 * 6) The information added is neutral and shows no bias toward one particular viewpoint. Everything is factual and no opinions are evident.
 * 7) Sources and References
 * 8) There is only one reference, so more should be found, but other than that all of the sources are relevant.
 * 9) Organization
 * 10) The organization of the content is good. There are a couple of spelling errors, but nothing major.
 * 11) Images and Media
 * 12) There are no images or media.
 * 13) Impressions
 * 14) Overall, I enjoy the content that was added and see how it can go in a good direction in the future.