User:Mensk123/Exploitation of women in mass media/Jeremyrios88 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Mensk123
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Mensk123/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
I feel the lead is well written and describes the article's topic.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? no

Content evaluation
The content is the user's sandbox draft is relevant to the topic and will add value to the article.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Tone and balance evaluation
The users tone is neutral and does not appear to be heavily biased toward a particular position. The user's content is adding neutral facts.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? somewhat
 * Are the sources current? one is from 2007 and the other is from 2018 - I would suggest more current articles and sources
 * Check a few links. Do they work? links in sandbox work

Sources and references evaluation
I would suggest adding more current data if available. One of the sources used is from 2007 and there is probably more relevant data available now.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
I believe the content is well written and easy to read.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
The overall content in the sandbox draft is good. I would suggest current articles to bring in more relevant information. I would also suggest maybe exploring the social media aspect further, as social media plays a huge role in almost every day life in this generation. I would also suggest not using the word "overweight" and stick with just "plus sized" in the sentence : "The research conducted exposed women to skinny models, as well as overweight or plus size models and measured the views on body image and their overall anxiety levels." I believe Mensk123 is off to a great start and will add value to the article.