User:Meodipt/2014 talk archive

PCPr/Phencyclamine
Hi, I was hoping you could help me. When I was a Wikipedian n00b I moved PCPr to Phencyclamine via cut & paste. Now I am attempting to merge the page histories, but I cannot move Phencyclamine to PCPr (via the move function) because the page already exists.

I either need the help of an administrator or I need you to move it for me, and either of us could undo my cut edits on PCPr. I felt it was a good edit because the page for PCP is a disambig page which easily leads to Phencyclidine... granted the name "Phencyclamine" leaves out the propyl chain, but it's kind of like "psilacetin" for 4-acetcyloxy-n,n-dimethyltryptamine.

Anyway, your help would be much appreciated (and any input too- I really don't care whether the new or old name is kept, but I think the new name is appropriate...I dunno, Phencyclopropanamine isn't bad either). Thanks!
 * (Psychonaut25 - 13375p34k / C0n7r1b5 12:03 AM EST, 06 February 2014 (UTC))


 * Hi Psychonaut25. Are people actually using "phencyclamine" as a common name for PCPr? I can see a few "unofficial" sources online using this name, but confusingly some people are using the same name to refer to the primary amine (i.e. 1-phenyl-1-aminocyclohexane) which is much less potent, so I see a lot of potential for confusion here. The accepted practice on Wikipedia for these pages is generally to leave the page as the code number until any street "common names" have come into really widespread use and been reported by citable sources, as these street names for designer drugs often don't end up getting adopted in the long term. Anyway I don't have admin privileges on here (they were offered to me once, but you have to commit to a certain amount of anti-vandalism work which I don't really have time for) so if you need help with a page move you might have to ask one of the admins who is active in this area. Cheers Meodipt (talk) 21:38, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Tenapanor
I noticed that you set-up the Tenapanor page recently. That's good, i'm impressed that you were doing that in your need. I wondered if you knew anything about JNJ-28583867, another tetrahydroisoquinoline design.Deass (talk) 20:08, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Deass (talk • contribs) 15:23, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of CYP-LAD


The article CYP-LAD has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced for 6 years and I cannot find any coverage in reliable sources to show WP:GNG is met.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 20:59, 12 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Sure, delete it if there are still no references. I added it because it was being sold as an RC back in 2006, by the same suppliers who originally released the bromo-dragonfly into the wild, but it looks like CYP-LAD never attracted enough attention to show up in drug seizures or be referenced in the forensic literature. Ironically with the recent upsurge in ergoline derivatives being sold as RCs (AL-LAD, LSB, LSP and LSZ for instance) it may well be that CYP-LAD could make a reappearance, but if it does so then it will be no great burden to re-create a page for it at that stage. Meodipt (talk) 03:52, 13 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Its a bit of a shame actually, now that I check it looks like CYP-LAD is the only structurally novel ergoline ever sold as an RC, all of the analogues sold more recently are known compounds that had been described in the literature. But as you say, no references, so wiki protocol dictates that it be deleted. Meodipt (talk) 01:49, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed Image Deletion
See commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cefbuperazone.png about commons:File:Cefbuperazone.png - one you created in 2008 and was moved to commons in 2011. Ron h jones (Talk) 18:17, 2 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Looks like the structure was incorrect, go ahead and delete it... Meodipt (talk) 12:52, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited BCX4430, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antiviral. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Ropinirole Synthesis
I corrected the synthesis like you said. I bought Dan's book 6 and that was how he did it with the primary amine. I knew it was wrong but thought maybe it was still an interesting compound but I could not access the full journal article w/o Athens password.--Lukashenk0 (talk) 20:39, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Also, he said i-Pr and not n-Pr. Don't worry, i'll correct all of it.--Lukashenk0 (talk) 20:43, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Discussion at :c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Menitrazepam.png
You are invited to join the discussion at c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Menitrazepam.png. Thanks. Ron h jones (Talk) 20:10, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited OSU-03012, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Antiviral and Antifungal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 31 December 2014 (UTC)