User:Mereheterotroph/Aphanothece/Avaloowhoo Peer Review

General info
Rockwithagun, AshlyLily, Katiemeow2, EdgarCorrale0619, Mereheterotroph
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Aphanothece
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
'''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you'''

- The article currently is straightforward, short, and simple. There is nothing distracting about the article and everything applies to the topic.

'''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?'''

- The article is neutral.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented.

- There are only a couple viewpoints expressed in this article, which appear to be unbiased, and straightforward.

'''Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?'''

- The links for the citations work. The source supports the information of the article.

'''Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?'''

Currently, the writers are using only one source. Increasing the number of sources will increase the quality of the article. There is not an obvious bias in the article's sources. Once again, more sources, and more information would increase the quality of the article.

'''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?'''

- There is a lot that could be added to this article - such as biology of the organism, location in the world, and current challenges/ research surrounding the organism.