User:Mereheterotroph/Aphanothece/Lluviosa Peer Review

General info
Mereheterotroph
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Mereheterotroph/Aphanothece - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Aphanothece - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Compared to the current version of the article, there has been a lot of extra content added. The lead is non-existent in the current version, the current draft has a lead added that reflects the information that was added. It is detailed enough without being overly detailed. All of the content is scientific in nature and neutral without trying to persuade the reader. I am not sure if the content is up to date because there are no other sources sited except from one from the 1800's however, I am not sure that this is the most up to date information that is available. I believe that the content that is added benefits the articles and adds more information to it. I would just like to see more than one source and potentially more up to date information if there are more recent sources that are available.