User:Mereheterotroph/Aphanothece/SnowEm Peer Review

General info
(Mereheterotroph, EdgarCorrale0619, Katiemeow2, AshlyLily, Rockwithagun)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Aphanothece
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Aphanothece

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead of the article is very concise and descriptive. It tells us exactly what the bacteria is on a very basic level. After checking the history of the article, and the sandbox draft, I do not believe it has been added to in a long time, so it would be helpful to start adding more information. There is not much information in the overall existing draft, so the lead doesn't need to be very detailed at this point, but should grow to include the main points covered in the article once they are added.

Content

The sections that are currently present make sense to be separated i the manner they are. Additional topics and subheadings should be added to created a more comprehensive article. The article has a great beginning, but could benefit from additional content being added, but it is up to date which is good.

Tone and Balance

The information in the article is non-biased and very neutral. It does not lead in any direction, and is very straightforward. No viewpoint is over or under represented. The article is non-persuasive, the information presented clearly has no bias.

Sources and References

This article only has one source and reference. The reference appears to be created correctly and cited in many places throughout the short article. The article could benefit from the addition of multiple, current sources of information.

Organization

The article is very well organized for the amount of information present. It is easy to understand and not cluttered. I did not find any grammar or spelling errors.

Images and Media

The image helps bring understanding to the article. It is well-captioned and applied to the article in a pleasing and well-organized manner.

Overall the article is a great start, but will really improve with the addition of new sources and an influx of information. History of its discovery, what differentiates it from other bacteria, and environments might be some good starting points to work from.