User:Mergansers/Arian Baptistery/AJ-Tinkess Peer Review

General info
https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/users/Mergansers
 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:Mergansers/Arian Baptistery
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Arian Baptistery

Lead
Your lead in looks pretty good, and gives good context to the time period and Theodoric the Great. I know not much has been changed in this section, but it's still pretty solid. Personally, I think you should add a bit more context to this specific Baptistry in your lead, just to learn more about it in general before you go into detail of the mosaics and structure. I think your sentence "Six graves have been discovered within the octagon. This is unusual because it is a Baptistery, but it is not unheard of that baptisteries would contain graves in Late Antiquity because it is recorded that church councils had laws forbidding it." would look better in a context portion of the article.

Content
You have such an amazing detailed description of the mosaic! Like you said, no amount of detail is too much. You describe it in a way as to where you can almost actually see it without seeing a picture of it. Is there any important meaning of this imagery in this specific work in relation to this baptistry? That may be something useful to add if there is any, just a general thought though. You also describe the shape of the structure itself very well, my only suggestion here is to play with it a bit to make it flow a bit better. You've added a lot of good information (and sources) into this portion of the article!

In your section of "Similarity to Eastern Orthodox architecture", I feel like you could add a subheading that talks more about in similarities in the mosaics and imagery in comparison to the other you discuss, just to separate it from the architecture similarities and organize it more. I also think the last paragraph is a little out of place in this section. You could again maybe give it its own subheading/heading, or edit it a bit to be relevant to the specific heading you currently have it placed under. It's very important and interesting, so I don't think you should get rid of it!

Tone and Balance
All of the content is relevant and neutral, which is definitely one of the more difficult challenges in writing on Wikipedia.

Organization
Besides some of the minor adjustments I mentioned above, it's all pretty organized and straightforward.

Images
You have two solid images in this article which I think are perfect! I really like the addition of the second image of the structure itself that you added, it adds a good visual of what it is from the outside.

Overall impressions
You've added a lot of good information into this article and I think you've made it a lot stronger than it once was. Keep up the good work, and I'm very excited to read your final article when this project is complete!