User:Merovingian/archive-2

lalalalalala i hacked into this sux0rs' acconut!!!! harharhar —Preceding unsigned comment added by Merovingian (talk • contribs)


 * Edit made under my account; seems my password wasn't very secure at this time. --Merovingian ※ Talk 11:59, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

You've got some problems, Mr. Mero. -- Cyrius|✎ 03:28, 31 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * I was referring to was the person using your account. Wasn't implying you had mental problems, however my pithy comment might have read :) -- Cyrius|✎ 03:40, 31 Jul 2004 (UTC)

The recent edits
The problem with the recent edits was not a compromised password being used at a different location. You should check for a compromised computer instead. Jamesday 03:38, 31 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Thanks! Same to you. 172 10:34, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * What he said. I dare say I'd vote for you. :) Ambi 10:36, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)

User_talk:Sam_Spade
See the link above. Cheers, Sam [Spade] 18:16, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)

You might want to merge the Tadoussac stub you just made with Tadoussac, Quebec (it is customary to add the province thus) and also mention it is at the mouth of the Saguenay River, overlooking a large fjord often filled with whales and boats full of whale-watchers on most days. AlainV 06:53, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Arbcom questions
A quick - OK, actually, probably a long question regarding your candidacy for the arbcom. How do you think you would have ruled/would rule in the following cases?


 * Requests for arbitration/Irismeister 2
 * Requests for arbitration/Mr-Natural-Health
 * Requests for arbitration/Wik2
 * Requests for arbitration/Paul Vogel
 * Requests for arbitration/Mav v. 168
 * Requests for arbitration/JRR Trollkien
 * Requests for arbitration/Cantus
 * Requests for arbitration/ChrisO and Levzur

Thanks very much. Snowspinner 17:43, Aug 2, 2004 (UTC)

No, only one vote per candidate. Danny 01:18, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Good luck, Ryan
Hello, there! I just got back from the polling booth a few minutes ago. I voted for you, and wish you luck. As I've said before, people your age should be encouraged to take on positions of leadership and responsibility, and you've proved many a time that you're up to it. Next time I call, you'll hopefully be in office:-) David Cannon 12:33, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Pope John XX
I notice you put a stub message on Pope John XX. Not that it's a big deal, but I can't help being curious -- what additional information do you envision might be added about someone who didn't exist? JamesMLane 13:37, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your response. Sorry, but I can't provide you with a link; I don't know of any written policy.  My impression, acquired through osmosis, is that a stub is only a beginning, barely scratches the surface, contains a small fraction of the information that a good article would eventually convey, etc.  In this instance, I think you're right to destub.  There's just not much more that can be added.  I called it no big deal because poor old Pope John XX may be one of a kind.  Offhand, I can't think of any other articles that are about someone who was neither a real person nor a fictional character.  :)   JamesMLane 00:43, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Fonts
Hi Mero. If you haven't managed to install the fonts yet that you mentioned on Brion's talk page, there are some easy to follow instructions at this site. Just unzip the fonts and then follow the instructions there. Once they are installed, Mozilla will usually automatically know to use them for Cherokee etc. Angela. 23:56, Aug 10, 2004 (UTC)

Re : Teo Teocoli. This is the only proper spelling of the surname of this Italian actor. See also : http://www.mediasetonline.com/personaggio/schedapersonaggio/439.shtml (in Italian, but surely understandable). IMHO, I still think that the article in question is a candidate for removal. Greetings from +32 degrees Celsius now, at about 21.00 UTC Radoneme 20:09, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)]]

Thanks for participating in the ArbCom elections. Danny 00:48, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)

New User Assistance Committee
Since the page is gone, I'll reply here instead. I wasn't writing it off as a completely bad idea. I just wanted to know how it would avoid duplicating existing pages but I guess it's aims were basically the same as the welcoming committee. Perhaps you might be interested in joining that instead? Hope you don't mind, but I deleted the talk page since the project page was gone and it didn't make much sense to have the discussion of a deleted page kept. Angela. 21:26, Aug 15, 2004 (UTC)

Song names in quotes
Howdy. I've been clearing up article titles containing quotes (normally created after following a red-link on a list of songs, albums, movies or books that has double-quote marks inside rather than outside the square brackets and moved immediately thereafter). I notice that you created a number of redirects to song titles (particularly popular Beatles songs) with quotes in the title - for instance "I_Am_the_Walrus" for I_Am_the_Walrus - on June 17th this year. Can I check with you that this was deliberate and that you still have use for the redirects please? - TB 11:47, Aug 16, 2004 (UTC)

mg:
Hi Mero, I guess I should've asked your permission before I did this... anyhow...

I sent an e-mail to the Madagascar Linux User Group about mg:

The response was this:

''Mark,

thank you for this information.

I'm forwarding your information to our "staff". By the way, can you tell us who has started this Malagasy initiative so that we can contact him?

Regards.

Hery Zo''

So I gave him the URL for your talk page, as well as the e-mail you give on your user page (that's the part that I shouldn'tve done).

Anyhow, I just thought I should let you know.


 * ) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Node ue (talk • contribs)

To Anacreon in Heaven
Merovingian, I just wanted to let you know that I have removed To Anacreon in Heaven from Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense: The next generation. It's not a joke. Those really are the lyrics to the old English beer-drinking song, and the music really is the basis for The Star-Spangled Banner. Kevyn 04:55, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Signature
Hi. I was using the pencil as a 'talk' symbol before, but I like yours much better. Do you mind if I steal it? If you want, I would be happy to credit you on my user page :) -[[User:Frazzydee|Frazzydee|✍]] 23:44, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Edit attribution
Hi Mero. Edits from 66.58.166.118 have now been reattributed to you. Regards  &mdash; Kate Turner | Talk 04:53, 2004 Sep 4 (UTC)

Linux
Hi. I reverted your edits to Linux because they were made while the page was protected. Once the page becomes unprotected, please feel free to add your change back. RickK 00:13, Sep 7, 2004 (UTC)

Atom Bomb
Hey, what happened to the little atom bomb in your sig? {Ⓐ&#8469;ά&#8475;ℹℴɴ } 18:32, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Island nation
The English language is not cut and dry. Nation can mean a cultural entity, but it can also be a synonym for country. Island nation is the standard name among both geographers and the general population for a country located on an island. Look what "island country" turns up on Google, hardly any of the hits are what you seem to think the term refers to. - SimonP 16:59, Sep 19, 2004 (UTC)

On your language lists
While I feel your plan on creating language families was not ill-founded, it appears terribly inconvenient in practice, seeing as one must click several times in order to get to a language of choice. In addition, the lists are what I would call "internally orphaned"; that is, they link to themselves and to a few other articles, but other articles do not link to the lists. I would therefore prefer that they instead become redirects to their better-done language family articles (such as List of Germanic languages to Germanic language), which have information that ultimately makes these lists redundant and obsolete. Please respond on my talk page. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 20:37, Oct 9, 2004 (UTC)

URGENT: Opposition to "Sam Spade": See User:Spleeman/Sam Spade
See a critic's tracking of SamSpade's activities on Wikipedia at User:Spleeman/Sam Spade Vote "NO", or reverse your vote, even at this late hour. This is criticle (and critical) information! IZAK 09:39, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)

See: User:Spleeman/Sam Spade:


 * From Sam's own user page: User:Sam_Spade/Theoretical_Biases
 * Removes references to groups such as the KKK as "right-wing"
 * Attempts to sugarcoat racist views
 * The claim the Geli Raubal was Hitler's mistress is just that, a claim.
 * Wants Hitler labeled as a socialist on the communism page (see Talk:Communism)
 * Insists on including his personal theories regarding a relationship between nazism and Chinese communism in nazism article:
 * User_talk:Andries
 * Talk:Nazism
 * From Talk:Socialism:
 * "I intend to do what I always have, which is insist that the Nazi's were socialist because... they were." (Sam Spade 00:32, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC))
 * Called another editor a "fascist" (Talk:Socialism). This is similar to his attempts to try to provoke me by implying that I was a nationalist, or not an anarchist:
 * "Enforcing american spelling is a sign of nationalism, and would therefore seem to suggest your not an anarchist? Or perhaps your a "anarcho-nationalist"? ;p" (Sam Spade 08:06, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC), User_talk:Spleeman)
 * "Censorship isn't very anarchist" (Sam Spade 23:25, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC), Talk:Anarchism/Archive10)
 * More on belief in non-racial eugenics: Why Sam is Right Wing (a list by User:Stopthebus18)
 * Stopthebus18: "People (including our country) have done horrible things in the name of eugenics." (StoptheBus18 16:02, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC))
 * Sam Spade: "Seems to work in Singapore. Bad things have been done in the name of all sorts of medicine, but we don't stop going to the doctor, do we?" (Sam Spade 17:21, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC))
 * Guess what everybody!!! "The attempt to paint them [the Nazis] as "reactionaries" is a propagandistic fraud." (Sam Spade 16:11, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC), Talk:Nazism) Wow! You learn something new everyday.... Not.
 * Hmm. For some reason, Sam doesn't want anybody to know that white-supremacist Wolfgang Droege was involved in drug trafficking.

The new List of (language family) pages
Hi Merovingian,

I applaud your efforts to add so many missing language families to Wikipedia - but nonetheless, hang on a second! This is producing serious overlap, in the case of Berber at least, and - due to the Ethnologue's sometimes author-specific classifications - POV problems as well. See Northern Berber languages and Berber languages to see what I mean. - Mustafaa 13:37, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * I'm really glad to see all this new Chadic stuff - I've been hoping someone else would do that! :) - and Cushitic could certainly use some bot work as well, but in general... don't you think a hierarchical List of Afro-Asiatic languages can be better covered through Afro-Asiatic languages and its children? This applies especially to Semitic, since the Ethnologue omits most extinct languages.  Also a minor point: there are subcategories Category:Berber languages, Category:Semitic languages, etc. - Mustafaa 14:04, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Ah. I see there's already been an argument of sorts over this in Indo-European languages.  Well, my case against splitting taxonomical listings of languages from the main articles is:


 * POV. Lower-level groupings (as in Berber and Semitic alike) are quite typically somewhat controversial among linguistics; this is compounded by the Ethnologue's refusal to give its sources for taxonomy, and the fact that it not infrequently (as with Senhaja de Srair language) simply gets it wrong for lack of data.  These issues cannot be addressed in a list; they require a full discussion of the various taxonomical efforts (see, for what I'd love to have on all of them, Afro-Asiatic languages.
 * Inaccuracy: having worked far too extensively with the Ethnologue, I know of too many cases where its language lists are inappropriate or wrong to want to dump the whole thing in here. For instance, Ethnologue's version of Nafusi language is not even a valid node (Zuara and Jerbi are Zenati, while Nafusi proper is not); and their division of Arabic dialects/languages is thoroughly arbitrary.  There's a reason they list "Data accuracy estimate: B, C" for most of the Middle East and North Africa.
 * Duplication of effort. A lot of language node pages already consist of little more than a list; almost all of them contain one already, if they exist at all.
 * Omission of extinct languages (from the Ethnologue)
 * Well, there you go... - Mustafaa 14:42, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I'll try and live up to the responsibility :).  I do think your bot could be a good idea, at least in some parts of the world (notably Papua - I doubt anyone's ever gonna get around to much of that); I just think that it should be integrated with the main pages (ie not List of Alacalufan languages so much as Alacalufan languages, etc....), so that when the time comes to expand it and fix any Ethnologue errors, that can be done from a single page. - Mustafaa 11:08, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)

AIW activity
The AIW that you founded has been experiencing activity recently. As the founding member, I thought you might like to check out what's been going on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Posiduck (talk • contribs)

Queen James
Please monitor the James I of England page and its talk page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CheeseDreams (talk • contribs)

Invite
Hi

I'm posting this to invite you to participate in WP:LCOTW, a project you may be interested in. Please consider nominating and/or voting for a suitable article there. Filiocht 12:34, Nov 8, 2004 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!
Happy birthday, Merovingian! Best wishes. --Whosyourjudas (talk) 01:58, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

RfA
Hello. I think we have similar views; would you care to vote on my request for adminship? -- 22:27, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Greetings!
Salve, Merovingian! Just wanted to say hello because, one, I like your handle, and, two, we seem to have some similiar interests, conservatism and language. I completely redid the Webster's Dictionary article and created articles on many other dictionaries. (See my list of articles I've worked on at User:PedanticallySpeaking/Articles.) Ave atque vale! PedanticallySpeaking 18:30, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)

ArbCom candidacy
Not to me a Negative Nancy, but I'm going to play devil's advocate... You've been considerable inactive as of late, are you sure you'd have enough time to devote to the ArbCom?

Just a question. Regardless, best of luck, my friend. BLANKFAZE | (&#1095;&#1090;&#1086;??) 18:26, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Sure, you'll have my vote, Mero. Everyking 18:03, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Why would I vote for someone who only calls me "friend" when they decide they want my vote. Come on now, you know better than that. Lirath Q. Pynnor
 * No, I don't know that. I havent seen you take any stance demanding that the wikipedia adopt more reasonable and fair standards of justice. You have not made any noticeable effort to stand up to the cabal or insist that sysops follow the rules. You seem to have urged greater "action" against trolls, but have made no suggestion as to how one can ensure that non-trolls are not attacked by irresponsible groups of sysops. Lirath Q. Pynnor
 * Well, thats why Im not voting for you -- you want more responsibility (power) but you haven't been responsible enough to look into some of the pressing issues of the Wikipedia (such as, why do vandals hate the wiki?). You have had plenty of time to realize that many wikipedians criticize the political system here, and you have chosen to ignore the problem (rather than address it). Im not interested in voting for someone who runs from the issues. Lirath Q. Pynnor
 * You claim that Wikipedia is run by a majority vote -- does that imply that you intend to advocate that all arbcom decisions should be made democratically by the community?
 * In any case, you claim that nobody "hates the Wikipedia" yet you also claim that they are just "taking advantage of our openness" -- why would vandals choose to vandalize, if dislike of wiki-policy is not a motive? Surely you don't have the naive belief that persistent vandals are motivated by sheer lunacy??
 * I assure you, there are people who hate the Wikipedia because it is run by a cabal. Numerous decisions here are made without democratic consensus, and many democratic votes are not well advertised or promoted (thus resulting in the domination of these votes by a small clique of hyper-active sysops).
 * Rather than advocating increased totalitarianism and banning of users whom you dislike, have you given any thought to the notion of making the wikipedia a friendlier place by requiring that sysops adhere to a higher standard of conduct?

Lirath Q. Pynnor

I'll vote for you if I can't vote for myself. I'm sure you understand. Good luck, sir. --Librarian Brent 00:41, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started the Free the Rambot Articles Project which has the goals of getting users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to... using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) version 1.0 and 2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to the GFDL (which every contribution made to Wikipedia is licensed under), but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles (See the Multi-licensing Guide for more information). Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. So far over 90% of people who have responded have done this.
 * 1) ...all U.S. state, county, and city articles...
 * 2) ...all articles...


 * Nutshell: Wikipedia articles can be shared with any other GFDL project but open/free projects using the incompatible Creative Commons Licenses (e.g. WikiTravel) can't use our stuff and we can't use theirs. It is important to us that other free projects can use our stuff.  So we use their licenses too.

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the   template (or    for public domain) into their user page, but there are other templates for other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace   with   . If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know at my talk page what you think. It's important to know, even if you choose to do anything so I don't keep asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk) 14:24, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)


 * Quoth: I'd like just my main-namespace edits CC-by-SA. What should I do?
 * It's pretty simple. Add the following to your user page or User:Merovingian/Copyrights:


 * All English Wikipedia main namespace articles or edits produced by myself are multi-licensed as described below. Any other namespaces are excluded.


 * That's all there is to it. Thanks! -- Ram-Man (comment| talk) 19:42, Dec 6, 2004 (UTC)

Hello
Thanks for nice message, I will vote for you! I hope you'll likewise vote for me too! :)--[[User:Plato|Comrade Nick @  )---^-- ]] 10:44, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Belated Thanks for the Welcome
Hi Merovingian, thank you for your welcome message back in March. I confess I have only recently learned the mechanics of the user talk section, so I apologize for the belated acknowledgement! Hfwd 00:57, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Votes for deletion/Gabriel Uzquiano
An anon at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Gabriel Uzquiano is dissatisfied with what his says is lies in the vfd discussion, and wants it speedy deleted. I don't think we should speedy delete or even just delete the vfd archive. But since you speedy deleted the article I assume you know why it was deleted, so perhaps you could add a comment disclaiming the inaccuracies at the top of the vfd archive page. Thue | talk 17:06, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Unverified images
Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:


 * Image:Inclined_plane.gif

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License,  if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk, automation script)]] 07:32, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.