User:Merovingian/archive-28

Proposed deletion of (160019) 1994 FE


The article (160019) 1994 FE has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NASTRO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:28, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of (160325) 2003 NV1


The article (160325) 2003 NV1 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NASTRO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:28, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of (160514) 1991 PQ9


The article (160514) 1991 PQ9 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NASTRO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:28, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of (160515) 1993 RP13


The article (160515) 1993 RP13 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NASTRO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:28, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of (160521) 1995 KU


The article (160521) 1995 KU has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NASTRO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:29, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Windows 97 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Windows 97. Since you had some involvement with the Windows 97 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ï¿½ (talk) 07:01, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of (7646) 1989 KE for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article (7646) 1989 KE is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/(7646) 1989 KE until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheQ Tester (talk) 05:44, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

ウィキペディア listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ウィキペディア. Since you had some involvement with the ウィキペディア redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 04:21, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of 74 Cancri for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 74 Cancri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/74 Cancri until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 19:18, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Beyond Treason for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beyond Treason is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Beyond Treason until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 20:00, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Had a question for you
Was wondering just the other day if you were still around. I could have swore that years ago, you created an article on the 20th Century Gross Building, which was deleted. I seem to recall that the rationale for deletion was that a historically significant building that's not listed on the NRHP is effectively non-notable. Am I dreaming this up? I did numerous searches looking for that discussion but couldn't find anything. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 00:19, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of O. H. Adsit for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article O. H. Adsit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/O. H. Adsit until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:04, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gone fishin soundtrack.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Gone fishin soundtrack.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. &mdash;Cryptic 21:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mark Barrott


The article Mark Barrott has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced BLP too old for BLPPROD. No indication of notability, no significant coverage in reliable sources found through Google News.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 18:23, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Mark Barrott for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Barrott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mark Barrott until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 17:29, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Poetic Justice soundtrack.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Poetic Justice soundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

👯 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 👯. Since you had some involvement with the 👯 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 22:09, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

🔞 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 🔞. Since you had some involvement with the 🔞 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

📳 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 📳. Since you had some involvement with the 📳 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Adam9007 (talk) 15:14, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Bichipedia listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bichipedia. Since you had some involvement with the Bichipedia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 23:27, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Wîkîpedîä listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wîkîpedîä. Since you had some involvement with the Wîkîpedîä redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 02:57, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Earl Family
Dear Merovingian,

I see that you are a major contributor to the wiki article on the Earle Family. Thank you so much for setting up this article. I am a member of this family, descended from Ralph Earle the settler of Rhode Island. I am also a wiki author. I added a bit of structure to the article and organized the listings of Earle Family members by century.

I see that the names listed here:


 * George Howard Earle IV (Navy Pilot)
 * Mary Sharpless Earle
 * Elisabeth Hotchkiss Ely Shedd
 * George Howard Earle V (Civil Engineer)
 * George Howard Earle VI (Man About Town)

That do not have citations or Wiki articles. Do you know these people? Are they still living? If so, could you add their bios as articles to Wikipedia and cite those articles? Or if that is not possible, perhaps provide a citation that shows their genealogical connection to the Earle Family. For example, if there is a published book that lists their name and lineage, or a genealogical society that documents lineage who has verified the genealogy. Or if they are listed in Pliny's book, give the page number (since there are 4,000 names in that book). I don't mind helping with this, but, since I don't even know what century these individuals were born, it is difficult for me to add the information about them.

Also, there is no citation or wiki listing for
 * Ralph Earle (captain) (I believe there has been more than one over the years) and
 * James Earle (painter).

It would be great to have, at the very minimum, the date of birth and death and the citation to page number in Pliny's book.

Warm regards,

--Karen Lile (talk) 16:56, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adams, New York (disambiguation)


The article Adams, New York (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unnecessary disambiguation per WP:TWODABS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix ( talk ) 06:26, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Zude for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zude is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Zude until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Neil N  talk to me 18:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:High crusade book cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:High crusade book cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Edits made to Colleges of the University of Cambridge
Hi, apologies if this isn't the right place, but I have a query about edits I made to this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Colleges_of_the_University_of_Cambridge&oldid=689179130

However my edits seem to have been completely undone, notably this has reverted the financial info to giving Net Assets instead of Endowments.

This means that Cambridge colleges are listed with NAV while the Oxford continues to provide Endowment information cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colleges_of_the_University_of_Oxford

I'm note sure who to ask about this... but do you know why the edits were undone and can they be re-instated to give consistency across the universities?

Thanks Jimmythehat (talk) 12:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)jimmythehat

Since you participated in the Sedna discussion
Minor planet 90377 Sedna > Sedna (minor planet) discussion taking place at Talk:90377_Sedna. Please join in if it catches your fancy. A previous discussion took place with a result of Sedna (planetoid) which is why you are on this list. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2016 (UTC)