User:MetersNotMiles/Amphictyonic league/Moonman15 Peer Review

General info
MetersNotMiles
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:MetersNotMiles/Amphictyonic league
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Amphictyonic league

Evaluate the drafted changes
Content

For the most part the content remains the same as between the two articles

Tone

The tone of the article remains the same as the original. There are subtle rewordings and fix some grammatical errors and clarifies the original article.

Organization

The organization of this is much better than the original article providing the viewer with a clear and easy to understand way of reading the article and to find items quickly

Sources

Some of the sources are unclear in what they are and are not in a proper format to clearly understand what they are. Some sources used also seem to only add additional details about some of the points discussed in the article proving no information of the origin of the original sources used for the citation. There are some locations in the article that do not have citations and looks like they need a “Need Citations” added.