User:Meticulousonion/Bila M. Kapita/Sankara-ture-lumumba Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Meticulousonion
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Meticulousonion/Bila M. Kapita

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, Meticulousonion has created an article that contributes new biographical data to the Wikipedia platform.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? The article is mostly an objective statement about Bila Kapita's life and work. However, the author's mention of how Kapita's peers interpreted his personality is probably too subjective and/or unrelated to his notability to be included in the Wikipedia article.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No. The author maintains their objectivity throughout.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I would like to suggest a more detailed explanation of how Kapita's identification of opportunistic infections in his patients led to the discovery that HIV/AIDS in Africa impacted largely heterosexual couples. While I think the article is a very clearly states that Kapita is notable for conducting this research, perhaps the larger significance of this observation will not be clear to an unfamiliar reader.   I would also suggest that the mention of Kapita's ability to shield scientists from political interference might benefit from more details. Which political leaders or specific events disrupted scientific innovation in DRC? Perhaps a reference to a figure or an incident that is detailed elsewhere on Wikipedia might help readers understand the political context of DRC in 1970s and 80s.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Sources are cited effectively and links are functional.

Organization

 * The article sections are consistent with other biographical articles on Wikipedia.

Images and Media

 * N/a

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * The author meets the notability standard in both the text draft and the outline for future work that will be conducted. Kapita is immensely important to research networks and researchers who are already featured in Wikipedia pages.

Overall impressions
==== This is an excellent article that covers an immensely important figure. The author was done an excellent job in reproducing the research networks and intellectual contributions of Bila Kapita and I look forward to reading the final version of their work. ====