User:Meticulousonion/Bila M. Kapita/Tmm4400 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Meticulousonion
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Meticulousonion/Bila M. Kapita

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? no
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? concise

Lead evaluation
The lead is concise and reflects the article well. You may want to discuss the sections within the biography of Kapita.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? yes

Content evaluation
I think the content is well in the biography section but I think there is content missing in the sections of published works and bibliography.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? it seems well balanced in this aspect
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Tone and balance evaluation
Good job overall in this part! I did not feel like the content tried to persuade the reader in any direction.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes
 * Are the sources current? yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes they did

Sources and references evaluation
The sources seem to work well and they reflect the topic of the article.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? none that I found
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes

Organization evaluation
Good job with organization as well! I did not seem to find any grammatical or spelling errors.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? no
 * Are images well-captioned? NA
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? NA
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? NA

Images and media evaluation
If you can find an image it would help make the article more appealing!

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? yes
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? the list is good
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? yes
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? yes

New Article Evaluation
There are many links, however, I think it was good as it is. Other than that, good work.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added? I believe this is a new article and it is impressive that you were able to gather a good amount of information. The content added was important and concise.
 * How can the content added be improved? Finalizing sections that have no words in it would improve the content.

Overall evaluation
Good job overall! I believe there is some unfinished sections but other than that it seems like this article is moving in the right direction.