User:Mets501/RfA standards

Below I have stated my standards for voting in Requests for adminship.

Requirements
Only under rare conditions will I give a support vote to a user who does not meet all of the following:  At least 1000 article edits At least 350 Wikipedia space edits At least 350 combined talk, user talk, and Wikipedia talk edits 3 months of experience No block history (except if blocked in error) No post-first-day vandalism (newbies often make mistakes) No edit warring Acting civil at all times Decent spelling/grammar 85% major and 85% minor article edit summary usage 

Bonuses
To outweigh the negatives
 * 1) Vandal fighting
 * 2) New pages patrolling
 * 3) Welcomming committee
 * 4) Voting in AFD's
 * 5) Good answers to RfA questions
 * 6) Helped to develop a featured article (note that this is not a requirement!)
 * 7) Member of at least one WikiProject

Negatives
Any of these could earn a neutral if not outweighted by bonuses
 * 1) Not a member of at least one WikiProject
 * 2) Limited range of articles edited
 * 3) Poor answers to RfA questions
 * 4) Does not understand what an admin really does
 * 5) Controversial userpage