User:Mets6559/Wilson v Southwest Airlines Co/ALR Student Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mets6559


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mets6559/Wilson_v_Southwest_Airlines_Co?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead could use an explanation of why Wilson v Southwest is important enough to have a wikipedia page. Something like 'the case that redefined bona fide qualifications in the US.' The lead could also define bona fide qualifications, I don't understand what that means.

I think the judgment section should cite to the case. I know it is already cited to earlier, and the case name is the title of the article, but the section refers to specific parts of the case without citations. At minimum I think there should be a citation after the quote.

The significance section brings up the fact that the SC interpreted the defenses in Wilson as separate defenses, but did not explain why that was significant. It mentions United automobile workers v. Johnson Controls but does not explain what the case is about or why it is referenced. Are the EEOC guidelines and state laws related to Wilson? If so, that is not clear, if not, they can be in their own section.

Good tone throughout, links formatted in an attractive way.