User:Mets6559/Wilson v Southwest Airlines Co/Heyitsjami Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mets6559


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mets6559/Wilson_v_Southwest_Airlines_Co?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Wilson v Southwest Airlines Co

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

The lead paragraph does a great job of introducing the topic in a clear, concise way. One improvement I would suggest, however, is to define what bona fide qualifications are. Someone who is unfamiliar with this legal realm would not know what this means.

Content:

The content added is relevant and up to date. I do not believe this article deals with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps or a historically underrepresented population, seeing as it is about a court case.

Tone and Balance:

The content takes a neutral tone and does not attempt to persuade the reader to follow a particular viewpoint.

Sources and References:

The diversity of the sources is great - there is a wide array of different secondary sources being used. The sources used are current, thorough, and accurate to the topic being discussed. All of the links that I checked worked.

Organization:

The content is well-written and well-organized. My only suggestion would be to capitalize the word 'court' when referring to the decision itself. There are no grammatical or spelling errors.

Overall Impressions:

Overall, this draft is well done. My main suggestions would be to define what bona fide qualifications are in the lead section (with a cite) and, within the body, to capitalize the word 'court' when referring to any decision a court has made.