User:Mettsis/Peach Springs Tuff/Druannharris Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mettsis


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Mettsis/sandbox
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * N/A

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

GEOLOGIC BACKGROUND

The second sentence about the Silver Creek Caldera is a little bit tough to read. I think I get what you're saying but maybe switch the word choice from "found" to something else? That may make it a bit clearer. The second to last sentence in this paragraph should read "ranges" instead of "range," but that's really minor! If there's more information about this super eruption I think it would be helpful to include just because that's interesting to some people but probably isn't a huge deal. I think you have really good information here!

TECTONIC SETTING

I think this information is good too! If there's information about why these particular environments are important or if they affected the eruption/formation of the Peach Spring Tuff it would be good to put it here.

MAGMATIC SYSTEM

You did a good job explaining how we know the magma was zoned here! I notice that you link the article for trachyte in the following paragraph but I think it would be beneficial to link it here as well since that's its first appearance in the article.

SILVER CREEK CALDERA

You did a really good explaining the history and significance of the Silver Creek Caldera! The table here for SiO2 and Phenocryst content is also a nice visual. I don't think there are any changes needed here.

PETROLOGY

I think it would be helpful to indicate the transitions between the zones, like does zone 1 start in the middle and zone 2 wrap around it like a circle? Or do they transition in a different way like side-to-side? I don't know if there's information about that or if that's common knowledge I missed somewhere, but I think it would be good to include that so a reader can get a visual of it.

Overall I think you did a really nice job! I totally forgot you could put links to other articles as words in a page, and it was super helpful in yours so I'm going to go back and put some in mine. I think the addition of a picture or map would be useful, and the article would look slightly prettier if the table of contents was below the title and lead sentence of the article. Your article reads really well and I learned a lot from it! Good job!