User:Mevistoveles

Hey, I'm Mevistoveles.

My main concern is the fact that The Big Bang is not science, yet so many believe it is.

Reasons for not being science:

Science deals with the observable in nature, not historic events.

A scientific model deals with ways things can happen, or what can be produced, e.g. the model for a car.

The redshift can be explained by galactic objects traveling at immense distances and gravitational differences, as well as gravitational time dilation of various other galaxies not corresponding to our galaxy.

We cannot prove that the galaxy is expanding. We cannot even prove how many galaxies are in the universe, or how far the perimeter of galaxies reaches.

And finally, you can't prove there was a singularity that contained all mass at one given time. List all your scientific evidence for it, if you want to. There is none, as science DOES NOT deal with History, it deals with what is observable in nature and then repeatable in the present. I admit, the big bang could possibly happen, but that doesn't mean it DID happen.

Other than that, I just spend my life relaxing and enjoying what can be enjoyed.

Theory:

My theory is that our known universe is within a massive black hole, where the Event Horizon prevents us from crossing into the area outside of it, and that other black holes may behave similarly to our universe. Essentially, black holes (Or universes) are within their own plane of existence, their own "Universe" as I would call them, with no point of return to the outside existence, and as the event horizon is on the dimension of time, there would be an infinite amount of space inside of the universe for three-dimensional objects.