User:Mg9901/Evaluate an Article

In my article discussing the history of radio everything is relevant to the article's topic except for the fact that the article includes some facts about the invention of color television even though it is an article about the history of radio, and that was really the main thing that distracted me in the article. Since it is a history article most of the information is not out of date because it is history, but I think a lot of new history of radio could be added as most of the information in the article is from the past. From first viewing I do not see any equity gaps and no one is being underrepresented as the article talks about the history of an invention, and outside of including more recent history I don't see too much that needs to be improved outside of fleshing out some less fleshed out topics. On that point there are some viewpoints underrepresented that in my time working with the article I would like to flesh out. The article stays neutral though and no claims contain bias. I can tell that the article gets its sources from a wide array of diverse article from different authors and publications and the links work for everything cited and they support the claims made, and most claims are supported with reliable sources although a couple do come up red indicating to me they are not valid sources to have in the article and the information mostly comes from reliable outside sources while also being mixed into sources provided through wikipedia, and as mentioned earlier there is a little bias as this is article is based on history. The conversation going on in the talk page is mainly asking questions on how the article could possibly be expanded as well as giving other examples of ideas an articles to use or to add when editing this article. The article is a part of WikiProjects and is level 5 vital article in history. The way they talk about is different because where as a lot of what we are doing is critically looking at articles in the talk pages it's mainly recommendations with their own sources to back up the new information they recommend.

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_radio

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I choose this article because I have an interest in the radio business and would like to know more about its history. My preliminary impression of the article was that it was well written but there was definitely more I could add and edit to make the article even better.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)