User:Mgb26/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (lPsychological anthropology)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. This is a field I am interested in, however I think it is less developed than other fields in anthropology

Lead

 * Guiding questions

The Lead includes a concisely descriptive introduction about the topic in general and major sections


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

 * Guiding questions

The article's content is of course relevant, but I would like to hear more up to date information related to the topic. i didnt find any content that does not belong to the topic


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions

The article's tone is of course neutral without having any biased position, overrepresented viewpoints or persuasion


 * Is the article neutral? yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions

Almost all the facts are backed up by a reliable secondary source of information and they reflect the available literature on the topic. The sources are more or less current and they work.


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

 * Guiding questions

The article it easy to read and clear, without any grammatical errors. Also well organized sections however most of them are 1 to 2 sentences.


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions

No images found


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions

The article is part of Wikiproject Anthropology and Psychology. It is rated as start class on quality class. The were discussing whether the term ethnopsychiatry is relevant and can be fit to be used.Also they have removed a paragraph and were thinking to incorporate a  new content in the article.


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? I couldnt see any difference, just think that some paragraphs need more elaboration

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions

The article can be improved by providing more information about the field. Its strength is that it includes all the names of universities that offer a graduate program in the course.


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: