User:Mgk812/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link)Natsuo Kirino
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.: Our teacher told us to evaluate this article for practices purposes.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? -They do not give enough information in the abstract section. There is only one sentence.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? - yes (maybe)
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? -No.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? -It is concise.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? -yes.
 * Is the content up-to-date? -Yes. It is recent.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? -At least, we do not research about herself, but it seems that they do not miss specific things so far.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? -Yes (it seems that many people are involved this article, not only one person.)
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? -No. (same answer as the first one)
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? -I think the content of writing styles and themes are overrepresented when we compare with other concepts.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? -I think they do not let us convince in a certain way.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? -They do not have enough references.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current? -Through briefly reading references list's articles, we found that one or some articles seem not reliable. Of course, they have a trust-worthy article as well.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? -yes.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? -Yes. They do not have any problems in language.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? -I think no.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? -yes.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? -No. They don't have any pictures that describe her or her works, career and so on.
 * Are images well-captioned? -No.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? -No.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? -No.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? -yes this is a part of Wiki projects. They are rated B or C in some fields.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? -we have learnt that

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved? -To put more information or images of herself and works.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: