User:Mgordier/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Perpetual access


 * Article Evaluation
 * The information already present is all relevant to the topic and discusses different facets of it in a neutral style. Not every claim has a citation, but there are quite a few that do, although three of the four citations are the same source. Both sources are published material, so they appear to be reliable. Not much has been done with this article, but it active in to WikiProjects, but is not of high priority.


 * Sources
 * Donahoo, N. S., & Aguilera, A. (2019). An ongoing treasure hunt: One library's practical experiences documenting post-cancellation perpetual access. The Serials Librarian, 76(1-4), 83-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2019.1586234
 * Greene, B. (2017). An Investigation of Perpetual Access Rights to Electronic Resources at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. https://doi.org/10.17615/de7s-4w52
 * Grissom, A. R., Knowlton, S. A., & Scott, R. E. (2017). Perpetual access information in serials holdings records. Library Resources & Technical Services, 61(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.61n1.57
 * Hodgkin, A. (2018). Perpetual access to digital resources. Incite, 39(5/6), 34. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.577279473557015
 * Pennington, B. (2017). Managing perpetual access. Serials Review, 43(3-4), 262-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2017.1385126
 * Polchow, M. (2021). Exploring perpetual access. The Serials Librarian, 80(1-4), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2021.1883206

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Internet Memory Foundation


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article does a great job already of ensuring that all the present information is pertinent and neutral to the topic, especially in dealing with the different stages of the subject over its existence. While there is a good amount of citation, not every claim has one tied to it. The citations are reliable and there is a good mixture of different sources. The article is flagged as having multiple issues and it is involved in four different WikiProjects, all labeled it as start-class and one listing it as low-importance.


 * Sources
 * Le Meur, J. & Tarocco, N. (2019). The obsolescence of information and information systems CERN digital memory project. EPJ Web of Conferences, 214, 9003. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201921409003
 * Medjkoune, L., Barton, S., Carpentier, F., Masanès, J., & Pop, R. (2014). Building Scalable Web Archives. Society for Imaging Science and Technology. Archiving Conference, Archiving 2014 Final Program and Proceedings, pp. 138-143(6)

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Newspaper digitization


 * Article Evaluation
 * With the short amount of information provided, it is all centered around the process of newspaper digitization in a neutral, structured manner. Not every claim has a citation and it needs more, but the citations provided are reliable. There is no talk page for this article.


 * Sources
 * Broersma, M., & Harbers, F. (2018). Exploring Machine Learning to Study the Long-Term Transformation of News, Digital Journalism, 6:9,1150-1164.
 * Georgieva, M. (2019). Successful Management of an Outsourced Large-Scale Digitization Newspaper Project. Journal of archival organization (1533-2748), 16 (1), p. 52.
 * Krahmer, A., & Douglas, L. (2020). A Collaborative Approach to Newspaper Preservation. Information Technology and Libraries, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v39i3.12593
 * Smith, M. (2016) “At Risk”: An Analysis of newspaper source materials digitized by U.S. and European repositories. Paper presented at: IFLA WLIC 2016 – Columbus, OH – Connections. Collaboration. Community in Session S21 - Satellite Meeting: News Media. In: News, new roles & preservation advocacy: moving libraries into action, 10-12 August 2016.