User:Mgordier/Perpetual access/He4150 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mgordier/Perpetual access


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mgordier/Perpetual_access?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Perpetual access

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?

Yes.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?

Yes the lead includes a quality introductory sentence.


 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?

Yes, but the article only has one main section. The addition of a section though is great.


 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?

No the lead is great for setting up the rest of the article.


 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

The lead is detailed and concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?

Yes the additions to the article aid the topic overall.


 * Is the content added up-to-date?

Yes, the article is up to date.


 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

No. But maybe there could be a possibility to expand.


 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

No.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?

Yes the content is neutral.


 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

No the content is neutral overall.


 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

No. The article is short but balanced.


 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

No the content is neutral.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

Yes, all content has reliable sources.


 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)

Yes, the links I checked were represented.


 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?

Yes.


 * Are the sources current?

Yes the sources are current.


 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?

I am not sure.


 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)

Not that I could find. But maybe article expansion is possible.


 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Yes, all the links I tested were live.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?

Yes, The content is well written


 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?

No.


 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Yes, but the is only one section. Maybe there is a possibility to expand the topics.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?

No.


 * Are images well-captioned?

---


 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?

---


 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

---

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?

The content definitely improved the article. Adding a topic and fixing the lead did a lot for the quality of the article overall.


 * What are the strengths of the content added?

The format chosen and edited created a better version of the article in general.


 * How can the content added be improved?

The content added can be improved by expanding on the topics in the article if possible.