User:Mhenderson20/Ronald S. Burt/Kevinh1000 Peer Review

hi

Hello Makayla, lol!

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mhenderson20


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Mhenderson20/Ronald S. Burt
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ronald S. Burt
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ronald S. Burt
 * Ronald S. Burt

Evaluate the drafted changes
This article features a great lead that reflects the new content added, it is concise and transitions easily into the featured content. The content is both relevant and cited properly. The article is engaging, yet neutral, and has a balanced content per section ratio. Links tested work properly.

Overall, the article is clear and concise, gives better insight into the scope of the subject's career and better information on his personal life. The article is also strong is showing the subject's academic and scientific contributions and giving links to them to be read. The article could improve on explaining some of the technical aspects of his work.