User:Mhogan170/Evaluate an Article

Lead Section: 1. Yes 2. Yes 3. No 4. Concise Content:Content: 1. Yes 2. Yes 3. No 4. NoTone and Balance: 1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Yes 4. Yes 5. NoSources and References: 1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Yes 4. Yes 5. No 6. YesOrganization and Writing Quality: 1. Yes 2. No 3. YesImages & Media: 1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Yes 4. YesTalk Page Discussion: 1. The conversations are thoughtful and critical 2. Well and Yes, in multiple 3. I don't understand from where this question is coming Overall Impressions: 1. I don't see any star or symbol at the top right, so there is room for improvement 2. Very thorough even though timespan is long 3. I saw immediately that sources need to be added 4. I think its developed well but there is still room for improvementMhogan170 (talk) 16:32, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article Cold War (1953–1962).)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.) I chose this article because I am fascinated by history.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)