User:MiAg6820/Blood Clot Boy/Dy gif Peer Review

General info
MiAg6820
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:MiAg6820/Blood Clot Boy (Draft 1)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Lead
The lead isn't overly detailed but is a good introduction to the rest of the article. All information in the lead section is a part of the rest of the article. Don't see any glaring issues.

Content
The content within the article is good in the sense that it seems to cover all of the necessary facts from the stories. I also believe that this covers a content gap on Wikipedia because Native Tales aren't something that a lot of places teach so it's good to write about them so people know and understand their culture. I would recommend to maybe add parts that go over why these tales were different, whether that was due to the tribes' location, geography, or culture.

Tone and Balance
The content is neutral and nothing seems to be biased. The article is simply telling of the different tales and isn't trying to persuade the reader to think in any way.

Sources and References
The sources worked when I clicked on them and they seem to be reliable. Almost all of the sources came from published books while the other two came from a university press. Two of the sources are current which are the ones that came from the universities. I think that you need to cite more in your article. I think you just added one citation at the end of the different tales because you probably only used one source for one tale, but from a reader's perspective, it looks like you only cited one sentence and not the entire paragraph.

Organization
I don't have any complaints about the organization of the article. You clearly state what the story is and then go into each of the different tales. There didn't seem to be any glaring grammar mistakes either.

Images and Media
There are no pictures. I would recommend adding a picture from each different tale to give the reader a better visual.

For New Articles Only
The article has the necessary sources which is good. There are a total of five sources but should be expanded upon during the final draft. The article also follows the format of other Wikipedia articles.