User:MiJaunMClark/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Basketball positions

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because basketball is one of my biggest interests in life whether I play, watch, or read about it.

Evaluate the article

 * lead section is concise, limited, did not over detail it
 * lead is brief and has the positions labeled in the section
 * the content is worded great
 * has the same amount of relevant content for each section
 * content is recent and up to date
 * the author is unbiased
 * just describes the positions never persuades
 * keep a great tone and does not weigh on one position more than another
 * some links do not work and some of the references are not links
 * the author does not use that many sources
 * uses one source for the same position never finds new ones
 * there are more reliable sources but the ones the author used were good
 * the info the author used was reliable but copied word for word
 * the author organizes it well and has concise info on each topic
 * very well written
 * very few to no grammar errors
 * the writing was smooth and easy to read
 * author only used one image, more needed
 * the image was described by the author
 * image was not rightfully cited
 * it is rated at the start class level
 * part of Wikiproject basketball
 * many negative edits talking about the redundant grammar and some terms the author left out that could help the reader understand more about the positions