User:Miaguilar/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Mills v. Board of Education of District of Columbia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because I think it's very relatable to what is happening right now due to COVID-19. Online schooling has forced everyone to be isolated and this article discusses the Mills v. Board of Education of District of Columbia which did not allow students with disabilities access to free education.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section

The lead does a great job in including an introductory sentence that discusses what the Mills v. Board of Education of District of Columbia was about.

Content

The content given is relevant. I do think there could be more details added regarding what certain students had to go through during this case.

Tone and Balance

The article is written from a neutral point of view. Just stating facts.

Sources and References

Sources and references are accurate. The link directs you to the actual court case.

Organization and Writing Quality

Article is well-written.

Images and Media

There are no images or media provided.

Talk Page Discussion

In 2010, Hugo 999 mentioned there was no year given. The article now states this lawsuit happened in 1972.

Overall Impressions

The article is well-written. However, I do think there could be some added details regarding what students were going through during the case and why it's important.