User:Miajgoldberg/Deaf Culture - Deaf Bing/Hapalow Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Hapalow is reviewing Miajgoldberg/Hillarypatricia Deaf Culture - Deaf Bing
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Miajgoldberg/Deaf Culture - Deaf Bing

Lead evaluation
The definition is clear. I think you may want to add a few sentences to your introductory with maybe some history? Was there any literature about Deaf bing? You can talk about how the community connects through shared experiences (cultural aspect). Also can talk about how this evolved from back then and now. Some new Deaf bings occurred due to technology. More Deaf people are sharing their Deaf bings on social media. Also, suggest add that Deaf people view Deaf bing as a positive thing not a burden or struggle they live with.

Content evaluation
Definitely all of the content is relevant and up to date. Just needs references.

Tone and balance evaluation
The tone is neutral and is just stating facts. There is no space for viewpoints.

Sources and references evaluation
There are currently no resources cited. References will make your article credible.

Organization evaluation
The organization is clear with definition and list of examples. An introductory and references would complete this.

Images and media evaluation
There are currently no images or media, definitely would agree in adding videos and images from Daily Moth and other cites.