User:Miam1026/Basilica Palladiana/Sabrinacucumber Peer Review

General info
Miam1026
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Miam1026/Basilica Palladiana
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Basilica Palladiana:

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall great progress! You did a great job keeping the content neutral and accurate. My biggest advice is to keep your sentence structure short and sweet.

I am a little confused are you working independently of this page? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basilica_Palladiana


 * it might be a user error I didn't see it in my sandbox

1. For clarity: In 1542, Romano recommended that the building's old form be reinforced rather than reconstructed, but [this] was rejected by the Council.


 * Kind of a hard sentence to read, maybe reword by talking about how the council rejected Romano's recommendation.

2. Reword: This would be Palladio's first public commission, so it took time for the council to accept his work. [Despite being chosen] as the architect in 1546, Palladio's drawings were only accepted in 1548 and developed into the final model in 1549.

3. Reword: The building is not actually a church, as the name "basilica" suggests, Palladio dubbed the building a "basilica", due to its resemblance to the ancient Roman civil structures of that name.


 * This could also be a sentence worthwhile of switching around "Palladio dubbed the building a "basilica", due to its resemblance to the ancient Roman civil structures of that name. It is not is not actually a church, as the name "basilica" suggests"