User:Miawach/ArticleEvaluation

Evaluated Article: Civic technology link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civic_technology My evaluation on the article link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Civic_technology#Article_Evaluation%3A_Generalization_of_continental_relations_to_civic_technology

Notes: - Warning banner at the top explains that the source relies too heavily on primary sources (suggests adding secondary or tertiary sources) - There are no images in the entire article. With the addition of images, the article would be much more visually entertaining, and might help with clarity for those who rely on tactile learning (interacting with images, words... as many tools as they can get their hands on) - Although the source usage has been critiqued, I like that almost every paragraph includes at least three citations. - wording is clear, sentence structure is well put together

- Someone added a section about civic tech in Japan because only Taiwan was referenced under the Asia section. Personally, I believe this article is biased in the sense that it only incorporates a few nations and generalizes that global sector as "Asia" or "South America" (in the South America section, only Argentina is referenced). It cannot be expected that only a few nations encompass an entire region's relationship with civic technology.

Miawach (talk) 00:33, 21 September 2021 (UTC)