User:Miccimeek/Overdrafting/Jaeden Akins Peer Review

General info
Miccimeek
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Miccimeek/Overdrafting - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Overdrafting - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Content: The draft article contains several sections that are each well-balanced.

Sources: The article includes eight sources, rather than only one or two, which makes it more credible.

Grammar: Verify the grammar in the "Environmental Impacts" section. I think there may be a couple of run-on sentences and places that need a comma. Also, verify the definitions of inequity and inequality to determine which one you should use in the "Socio-economic effects" section.

Overall: The sections are well-balanced in length. The "Possible solutions" section was interesting, and I think it contributes to the article well and makes its content more diverse. I would suggest verifying the grammar as previously mentioned. You did a great job of maintaining a neutral tone while presenting possible issues and solutions from your sources.

Well done!