User:Michael.gary16/Liquid democracy/Ajsorota Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Michael.gary16


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Michael.gary16/Liquid democracy


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Liquid democracy

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hey Michael! Super interesting topic you chose here -- I really enjoyed reading about liquid democracy. Overall, this article is fairly comprehensive and digestible; the lead is concise and straightforward, and the extensive examples really help the reader understand what liquid democracy may look like in practice. Additionally, I particularly enjoyed the parts you added in the "Criticisms" section about Professor Landemore's book. I just have two brief comments that might be worth considering:

First, I think it would be beneficial to gather some more sources for the criticisms you raise, so that you do not need to rely so heavily on a singular book. I would also check the citations at the bottom of the page to make sure they are all updated/valid -- I believe I spotted some missing/invalid links there.

Second, I would love to read a bit more about the theory behind liquid democracy. Although there is a plethora of practical examples provided, I seem to be yearning for a more robust explanation of the justifications for liquid democracy, and what the ideal version of it may look like. While your lead says that most writing about liquid democracy is based on empirical research rather than political theory, I nonetheless think it would be really helpful to expand this portion of the page.

I hope these comments are constructive for you. Best of luck with the rest of your project!