User:MichaelFHatt/Trailer (promotion)/PeterBuon Peer Review

General info
MichaelFHatt
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:MichaelFHatt/Trailer (promotion)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Trailer (promotion)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I am not sure where within the Accusations of Misdirection paragraph this will be inserted. I think it would be a good idea to insert it into the entire paragraph in a way that makes sense rather than having it on its own as a separate paragraph in the section. Same with the Composition section and edit.

The content is relevant to the topic while also being clear and accurate, as far as I can tell, and you did a great job linking to definitions and sources. However, if possible I would also add a definition for Bumpers just like you have Dailies.

The content is in a neutral tone addressing both topic specific concepts and details along with accusations.

The sources are current and reliable.

As for media, I wonder if it would be possible to add a visual representation of Dailies or Bumpers to the article as well.

Overall, I believe these edits make sense and do contribute to the article as a whole. They further educate the reader on the subject with a neutral tone and, because they are not uncommon within the topic of trailers today, are necessary to understand what trailers are and how they come about in their entirety.