User:Michael Lloyd2020/LGBT athletes in the Olympic and Paralympic Games/Vincenzoanthony Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Michael Lloyd2020
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: LGBT athletes in the Olympic and Paralympic Games

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? I am not able to see the peers edits in the article but the content in the sandbox is new and contributes to the article well.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, it introduces the acronym and briefly outlines the topic.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes, in the sandbox
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Yes but could be more in depth

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Needs more early history

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, all are in the aid of advocacy of LGBT in the olympics.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Advocacy seems overrepresented but it fits the topic
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, most are related to the topic and are informed parties
 * Are the sources current? Yes, with some as recent as 2019
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? It is easy to read but I do think there needs to be more about the early history of the community in the olympics. Also, the article needs to reference this phenomena in other sports to show it is not specific to the olympics.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Not that I picked up on
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes but there needs to be more content added such as the controversy about the topic.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Not yet but if the contributor adds content it could be very meaningful to the article.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The piece of research added to article is vital to the early history of this topic and if explored can lead to further research.
 * How can the content added be improved? There just needs to be more content added in general to have an idea of how it can be improved.

Overall evaluation
Michael Lloyd Response to Evaluation:

I agree with the comments. I have recently updated my sandbox in order to add not only more historical content but also images in order to give the reader a more in depth understanding of the athletes. Another aspect of my article that I have edited is the addition of the Gay Games and their founding which will aid in providing a more in depth understanding of the controversy of the topic.