User:Michael Zakaria/sandbox

Creating Assyrians and Assyrian issue ... the book that has lost its shadow

Ayoub Peter ayoubpetros@yahoo.com appear on Ankawa dot com electronic pages from time to time articles and topics adapted or movable text that deal with issues and questions of our contemporary history, reconsider these articles and repeat the above but without the views of the category Assyrian, has stirred up controversy Assyrian at the time and did not been the subject of critics and researchers agreement, the judgments that are exposed now to review and re-evaluation of its supporters themselves, and ordered another about these articles is that the carrier or adapted usually reticent to the root of his sources and does not refer to books and publications that convey them, in addition to the burner or prepared for this time seems determined not to discuss, but exposure to symbols of Assyrian known (owner Khoshaba and Assyrian tribes) and speak of a deliberate intention to it, and here is Mr. Elias Hanna Matthew in his article quoted "massacres Semel between past and present," which quoted from the book "The Assyrians and the issue Assyrian era talk "to Barmte, and chose the paragraphs relating Assyrians followers of the Eastern Church, who insists on calling them" Nestorian tribes "Unlike the book, which carries it and review the circumstances and conditions that preceded involving the Assyrians in War One and their relationship with government authorities and their neighbors and blames Hanna religious leadership on deception and misinformation in which he was the Assyrians by those who claimed their friendship and protect them from the Russians and the British to displace them from their homes and then exploited to serve their plans and protect their interests, leading up to the events of 1933 painful was Hanna touched on the interactions and discussions within the Assyrian leadership in which devote two trends; I (religious leadership and its supporters), calls to do against the local authorities and to cooperate with friends and rely on them in the hope of achieving our wishes, and the direction of a second (the civilian leadership and its supporters), rely on the calm prefer not to comply for foreigners to spare his people the horrors and the search for solutions to our problems in the framework of national, and, as noted, Mr. Hanna was not neutral in preparation the theme of which stems from the preset position and adopts the point of view supported by the owners of the first direction and enthusiastic about them, while trying to pour scorn Exposure to lead the second vision (owner Khoshaba) and biasing much on the Assyrian tribes. As already mentioned Mr Elias Hanna Matthew took his essay from the book "The Assyrians and the issue of the Assyrian in the modern era," the Russian writer Assyrian Constantine Petrovaj Matviev (Barmte), which was released in Russian in Moscow in the late seventies and is in excess copy of an earlier book published mid-sixties and Russian also expressed Mar Youkhana and Barmte in the name of "The issue of the Assyrian during and after World War 14. up to 33" was translated into Arabic on the two parts of the Iraqi writer Osama Naaman at the end of the sixties, he published the first part of 1970, which was soon withdrawn from libraries and banned from circulation and blocking the second part of it from being published ahead of a visit late Mar Shimon Esha Iraq!. But this whipped version of Barmte which quotes including Hanna has been translated into Arabic for the first twice in America by Mr. Jonah Jonah, and the second (and in question) by (h d A) with the support and the assignment of Assyrian political movement known, which adopted Nscherketab and distributed publicly for the purposes of own political and partisan purposes, and re-remake once a copyright owner and distribution, the same party that Nqsdha translators in this article, it is worth mentioning that there is a significant difference between the translation and Naaman and h d a. With that said Translators at the forefront of the second translation (translation h d a) "The first translation in the United States canceled the vertebrae and materials is easy from the book, which made us translate the book again with" some "additions which we considered necessary and important and neglecting some of the paragraphs and sentences that were not" Minutes "in their information so as the (error) is normal to the clerk potential search very difficult and fact-if not non-existent at the time for what some of the incidents that took place in a semi-closed sites was not the author can get accurate references in question." Dear reader enough of this paragraph alone because you lose the book a great deal of scientific and academic importance and raise doubts and suspicions in the views of the author and in the credibility of the information supplied by it, and here they Translators repeat the same Makhzhm the translation first and even increased insult to injury Translators this time also gave themselves the right In deletion, cancellation and amendment had to be right and wrong and the right to add an important passages for them and neglect or dropping the vertebrae or other sentences were not accurate in their information according to their vision of the private and appreciation, What is left out of the book ?, The result permission to translate them these were not honest and it is not accurate, Translators time it acknowledges here that the author's mistakes and justify it by saying: this is normal because of the difficulty or impossibility of obtaining accurate information to potential weakness or a lack of research and investigation to the author. In other words that translate them this the "disposal" of the contents of the book, in addition to possible errors of the author by their recognition of this, and so has this translation "Adapted" It is known that translations that are "adapted" does not rely as sources of trust are not considered credible references, and certainly that there are motives The incentive behind this act of translators because they are trying to harness their translation of the book to serve specific objectives and purposes of their own, and their goals and intentions that may not be identical to the truth and reality may not be correct originally .. this and that the reader of the book itself notes clearly that the author in addition to his mistakes signed by translators, on the basis of Classification Introduction translator This (translation h d a) falls into the first category of writers and authors in the Assyrian history who spring from the "intolerant and non-objective look and be their writings just biased the facts and incidents and Amoalat in the description listed" as we see it and the whole book space is committed to a radical and fanatical look and tends Sometimes too much to exaggeration and exaggeration in the description and in the launch of the verdicts, and this simple plucking of the book are those of the author of the period surveyed in the article to demonstrate that: "The author says that 30 000 Assyrian families sought to move to Russia before 1915 (150 000 people) and mentions in place The last that fifty thousand others from the Iranian Assyrians who followed the Russian withdrawing troops north of Iran from the beginning of 1915 remained in Russia, in addition to other thousands of displaced them from Turkey and Iran before the war, during and claimed that Russia embraced the Assyrians and provided them with means of comfort, safety and stability, however, the the number of Assyrians in the Soviet Union, according to the official census in 1970 was 20 000, 50 000 Author make it count in 1980, but now Fddhm In all the former Soviet Union, not Russia alone is between (70-90) thousand .. ... that the Assyrians fought a bitter struggle against Western missionaries to enter the Russian church and announce desire 40 000 Assyrian Iranian and a document signed by 234 priest Assyrians to join this church for the end to say that the number of entrants actually was 9 thousand only, and adds: That was a victory resounding Russian Mission .... And the author based on sources that 250 000 Assyrian came out of Urmia in August 1918, and that Khmsin Alv of them died on the road between Urmia and Hamadan, of whom ten thousand in one place, and arrived in Hamedan 200 000 Assyrian subsequently transferred to the death camp in Iraq, consisting of 3000 a big tent, including many allocated for public services and the other to manage the camp, tents, enough per tent for living twenty turnoff the maximum Astaabha, while accounts Barmte must cornered eighty turnoff at a tent How?! ... Englishmen said that the camp population does not exceed fifty thousand while the Assyrians said numbering nearly percent, but they became 200 000 at Barmte ... adds Barmte that 33 000 Assyrians died in the death camp, but Agha Petros held a spring 1920 a memorial for 14 000 Assyrian died in this camp and each martyr Assyrian fell in that war ... the Iraqi government agreed with the English on stripping Assyrians of arms, pull all the pieces of the Assyrian North fibrous (fibrous was in the Summer House in the mystery of columnar Semel during the massacre) and it brought all the police stations where the Assyrians served in the north and in the south where collected !!? Also quoted all the Assyrians policemen outside Mkhafarhm and to other areas just before the events of 1933 ...... The author says that the number of Assyrians who caught up to the late owner Yako to the Syrian border in July 1933 they were twenty thousand, while the owner of Yako himself said in his book "Allathurion and two world wars," Tehran 1963, 950 men and they had exaggerated the Iraqi government said the number is 1350, a fighter asymptotic number as stated in other sources neutral "(if owner Yako 20 000 fighters at the time of the Assyrians invaded their ......... .. !!) ....... And other times this information and verdicts that can not be identified and that lack accuracy and objectivity, maybe are exaggerations or are mistakes unintended, as Abrrlh biographers described because Ncih author and his upbringing in a closed political environment and state control of the media and communication and the difficulty of obtaining correct and accurate information in a system strict oversight aggravating and live on the pattern laid down by the party leader or the sole leader, who claim to possess the truth and perfection, and woe to those who Khalvhma is retroactive agent and traitor to the homeland and the nation does not deserve to live, so the author found himself within this intellectual framework, the category leader and the leader of the sole between the Assyrians and intolerance for them, this education Vshilt and that background on the bar Matti passing judgments absurdly accusing people and Tkhuynhm free task if it does not Atnagmoa with his group Aouhzbeh approach and did not walk behind the leader, at a time when the creation of the justifications for each what was done by the group tries and Wenzhe wrong movements and positions stemming according to the claim of the fundamental interests of the people and homeland, so everyone who Khalvha is ungrateful for the rights of his people and a traitor to his nation, large and Dear reader irony in all of this the fact that the author is not convinced, including line and wrote not believe in it !! He did that because he expected to get gains from behind as stated in London after he moved after the collapse of the Soviet Union and left angry and returned to Moscow in protest to deny the Assyrians (who have their hands) to Avdhalh this. The author, whether it is sincere or toady or opportunist has adopted in his point of view and take a stand tried promoted Fbalg and intolerance and carry his book is objective ideas and information is accurate and fired the provisions of impromptu unrealistic, brought out for researcher academic and objective student equitable and of neutral specifications and rendered the book, this feature being study objective scientific perspective analytical as claimed Translators these translators also increased mud dulling as we have said it acted on a whim in the deletion and addition, all of these factors combined: 1. partisanship author and his commitment to the principles of scientific socialism and Tzmth in his faith (dictatorship of the proletariat) and embraced his party's line and policy of their own and not accepted opinion the other, which does not exist mainly in the totalitarian regime who lived in his shadow, so it is biased by virtue of its origins and upbringing and (Aidulogith), which necessitate him to look at things from one side, Vthms category Assyrian leader without the other. 2. disclose the concepts and standards of socialist material and trying to apply them to complex tribal priestly Khabna and study activities and interpretation of its activities on its light and this is misplaced. 3. Author opportunistic with regard to the issue of the Assyrian, and wiggle his positions, he claimed what does not believe in him, and said line and what is not convinced by the prejudice to the form of the system where he was raised as explained. 4. translators certificate of non-objective author and the lack of realism and its tendency to exaggerate and excessive and extravagant in passing judgments also appeared on the book area, has echoed the words is not accurate and is uncertain because he was under the influence of tight control and difficult for him to get the correct information. 5. translators doubts the credibility of the sources and confirm that there are errors which occurred author, Translators corrected some of them by their desire !! And they left the other to that of a suitable Abrroha it has signed away from the author in a semi-closed environment for him. 6. confession translators also rich kingdom and tampering with the contents of the book of information, events and views and comments as appropriate for their goal and their reasons, which they declared. 7. attempt to guide the translators translate them specific destination to serve political ends and goals the party and strengthen their position and their view of the case and their announcement of the Assyrian openly expressed dissatisfaction with the translation of America. 8. Is it not enough of the above dear reader, to raise suspicion and the establishment of doubts in the credibility of the content of this book translator and losing him for a lot of scientific and historical value and erosion of trust in the information it contains, it is not justice that is considered an authoritative reference, or a source prudent not valid cited his input or the adoption of its contents a measure of the study of our issues and interpretation of our activities or take a standard for assessing national personalities Assyrian national and symbols ... In sum, the Barmte was not impartial in his handling of the issue of the Assyrian In his assessment of the parties and did not look at the issue in all its aspects was studying all positions on them, but took a party of them and bias him and supported him at the expense of the other parties, and on this basis must read this book in Arabic and translated ... I am most likely that if the author was able to review his book now, after the collapse of the Soviet Union gave up a lot of ideas and proposals that broadcast it.

Either the carrier or the copyist Mr. Elias Hanna Matti she is increased other thing worse hide it its sources, and the selectivity and bias and Thzbeh and trying to harm deliberately majority of the Assyrian and Pthgmeh unjustified on the Assyrian tribes and contempt for their customs and traditions and heritage and the faith and sacrifices of those sentences poorly worded naive and ideas that have tried to link the paragraphs quoted, But who knows Mr. Hanna said the tribes were and are still the main component of the Assyrians who are talking about them, and that the sacrifices and bravery tribesmen them and the wisdom of their leaders and their courage was saved by the nation of genocide and made all feats and the glories of the Assyrian in the First World War and it was the most energetic and sacrifice of the group for the rights of nation among the Assyrians of Tur Abdin to Lake Urmia and Hakkari to Nineveh!?, whatever the motives of Mr. Hanna political and partisan, it does not justify the amount shown by the malice and hatred of people who are renowned for their nobility and bravery, loyalty and sacrifice for the sake of their nation and the future of their children and also does not permit manipulation of vocabulary and concepts historical and social like replaced Assyrian tribes tribes Nestorian and housing resettlement and Nineveh in Mosul, and as we have said Fmqalth movable about the book above the paragraphs and sentences incoherent and other mysterious, Like the one who moves without ponder and scrutiny, but leads him hatred and hatred ... and the title of Mr. Elias reproducible "massacres Semel between present and past "We will look briefly responded to points where that follow discussed later. We know the size of massacres of our people in the struggle for it to stay in the home of his grandfather, and perhaps the people of the most people in the region who have suffered from the killing and slaughter, displacement and may be the only people who lost half the population of the First World War and the massacre Semel is one of the Other massacres did not last not, and so always referred to as (Semele Massacre) in all periodicals, documents, references, although the killing and slaughter had happened in different places and multi-day, but the biggest Alqtol was in the village of Semel so named b (Semele) massacre, but the copyist Elias Hanna Their plight owner Author tempted to exaggerate even in the vocabulary (The massacres Semel has signed its events in 1933), and he did not give the benefit similar Alahaddat..want Lord Elias not endemic indigenous people in their homeland, possible to change their residence !. Reiterates Elias his talk about (clan Nestorian) Assyrian rather than in Hakkari intended Assyrian tribes, as if there were the families of the Chaldean and other Syriac, (for Amzhb) these tribes as well, or to avoid mention nationalism, or wants to be underestimated because disgruntled them, I do not know why !? May be motivated sectarian, partisan, or is Ahmed Sousse effect, no one from the neighboring peoples and countries that have been subjected Assyrians designated by (b clans Nestorian) nor are they styled themselves so, but they are proud that they (the tribes of the Assyrian free or independent) they do not know of Nestorian bit too much, but honestly believe in Christ on the way Assyrian only. I do not know what he meant this duplicator (b foolishness clans and Nestorian Aftrathm) We do not know why consider it? Do this pedant that tells us what that enabled these tribes primitive ignorant according to the claim of resilience, survival and preservation of its existence and its existence and maintenance of heritage, customs and traditions and protect the nation and that remains a distinct over the centuries and decades amid this hostile different ocean that thaw peoples and many tribes, and whether it also tells us for neighboring clans or other people in the region more civilized and sophisticated of them are .... Do you love politics and Almtzeysan these days, Lord, that Elias ashamed of clans and condemn everything unrelated to him!?. Has not delivered from Elias Matthew Hanna even a single Nineveh is put in parentheses and treats her like a word exotic or strange, followed by (former) whenever said Mosul Vilayet, if that is permissible because the author lived in compelling circumstances described by biographers described, but not true for you never you know Lord Elias It is still the province of Nineveh and its city of Mosul and the inhabitants of Mosul are proud to present (Nineveh) because it was the capital of a great empire upscale. Will heard any of you (to invite the English to establish Assyrian state in the Mosul Vilayet) which Iqtbsa Mr. Elias of was due, not the Assyrians said no Englishmen whispered nor their sources reported that, right this Astnsag without ponder ?, though that the British wanted to assemble the Assyrians in the Mosul Vilayet during the referendum its ownership and the demarcation of the border, and then to not have their heads !. The question of the use of the Assyrians to quell Arab and Kurdish Iraqi popular movements that have long argue writers and historians racists chauvinists, which has consistently chant after them from claiming national and progressive of our writers and Ssayasna likes Barmte and followed Elias is that Ancefoa this helpless people, any of those popular movements that attacking unarmed civilians, women and children in their homes? Is it self-defense in this case is to suppress popular movements ?, Where else happened to the alleged repression!?, Assyrians remaining in the death camp defended themselves and their children when the Arabs attacked by the summer of 1920, and this was the first and last contact between the Assyrians and Arabs rebelling, Assyrians also defended in Mandan camp near Akre about themselves and their families when they were attacked by Kurdish clans autumn of 1920, in both cases it was in self-defense was not the hand of the Englishmen (only they have put the Assyrians in a position of self-defense). While wrote owner Khoshaba and Agha Petros, who were leading the five thousand Assyrian fighter in "campaign back home," private messages to tribal Kurds teach them in that they were going to Diarhma and never target them and would like to sincerely live with them in peace and security and harmony, while the use of small units fibrous to suppress elders Kurds revolted against the British in the north, it has been on a small scale and had no effect on the Iraqi revolution of the twentieth, did not we hear who lived our fathers mentioned period for such as that alleged by Mr. Hanna religious conflict, and did not hostile to the Arabs and the Kurds, Assyrians because they are Christians, and Christians then were covering the map Iraq and deployed in the environs of Zakho FAO did not even Amsshm bad one because of their religion but was blame and reproach to those Assyrians who were forced to put themselves at the disposal of the foreign occupier and for a period. Then there is the issue more important than this and that: Why masquerading these Almottagolon and those who follow them, to service enormous Assyrians of Iraq, they did to him what he did not do other Iraqi ethnic groups, large and small, the Assyrians added large areas to the map of Iraq thrown off Turk spend Rawandoz the whole of 1923 and dispelling them He announced to you that Ttoekm will be based on giving you the same rights and the salaries and bonuses of Amathlkm charged by employees of the Iraqi army ... ..valy volunteerism and service, O brave soldiers. The families of all the Assyrians did not turn out to be a tool of the British got rid of them after the entry into force of their importance as Barmte claimed and was followed by Mr. Hanna, why overlook this service tremendous sacrifices for the establishment of the modern state of Iraq?, And to rely only to be regarded as their defense of themselves great !! sin. Maligned Mr. Elias he entered the events of the door of the other was not where looking himself to it and the view from one side and he adopted the views of losers and Alkhaiban them who are trying to naively salvage themselves from the responsibility to involve their people adventure ended in a bloodbath, as a result of their arrogance and recklessness and short-sightedness and flout the lives of our people, these who distorted the facts and distorted the events to cover up their failure and disappointment and evasion of responsibility for their work. We do not want Mr. Elias to make a living on the crumbs of others .... And advice to him and people like him have to stop repeating these cliches that eating and drinking by the age .. as long as the grace of the Lord with all of us ended the first part, followed by the second part entitled "The leader of the clan owner Khoshaba or national leader?"

Source www.nala4u.com