User:Michaelorlando/sandbox

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?

 * A large portion of the article uses citations from unreliable/inappropriate references, and not every sentence has a citation.There are citations from merriam webster dictionary, "Uptodate.com", and "Amboss.com". I am going to improve both the reliability and quantity of references.

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

 * Yes, but the organization of the article can be adjusted to be more friendly to the average Wikipedia reader. Rather than begin the article with "Differential Diagnosis", I will adjust the article to begin with a "Causes" section (instead of Differential Diagnosis and Pathophysiology) and expand that upon it.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?

 * Not all links work. Some are generic "Uptodate.com" or "Amboss.com" links.

Which sections will I prioritize?

 * I am going to attempt to revamp the entire article, but I will primarily focus on "Causes" and "Diagnosis".

What resources do I intend to look up, and when?

 * I intend to use primarily textbooks eg Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine and Essentials of Family Medicine. I will also use secondary academic journal articles if available.

Will I also embed additional links to other Wiki pages?

 * Yes, part of improving explanations of the concepts on this page will include linking to related concepts' respective wiki pages.

How will I ensure I avoid "doctor-speak" and not use jargon?

 * This will be challenging but I will do my best.